Oh man is it SMOKING in here! TROLL FIGHT!!! Heres the lineup: PS3 Fanboys vote for Black Ops, Xbox 360 owners are split but a lot vote for Reach, Including myself. The only way you can fairly judge the 2 is if YOU PLAY THEM BOTH.
CoD kicks all 5 halos right in the cooter
Nope, MW2 fails and its not as realistic as you think.
Black Ops is better and it hasnt even came out yet..
I personally think that reach is going to be better in the long run. I say thyis because a new GOOD halo game comes out every two years. The only 1 year cycle thing was ODST and it bombed hardcore.(correct me about the 1 year cycle) While Call of Duty is just the same game style and plot line over and over again. Although they some how always have amazing mutliplayer. Ther do however have a lot of unrealstic thing about both of them.
Everyone says halo is unrealistic. Hmmmmm last time I recall the events of halo were sometime past the year 2550. And Call of Duty's features may as well been in the future. Modern Warfare Allows you to call in massive bombing strikes and nukes that may well cost billions of dollars in the process. At least halo reach's events could happen. Modern warfare isn't anything like real modern warfare.
