ForumsThe TavernWW3 Weapons

33 6718
TheDeadlySphinx
offline
TheDeadlySphinx
3 posts
Nomad

What do you think the weapons of WW3 (if there is one) will be?
Will the weapons be ones never heard of, or never thought of before?
Post your ideas here....

  • 33 Replies
1337Player
offline
1337Player
1,766 posts
Peasant

This reminds me of Einstein's quote.

I don't know how man will fight World War III, but I do know how they will fight World War IV; with sticks and stones.

I hope that none of the countries will use nuclear bombs. That's what started cancer.
I think WW3 will most likely be fought with bombs and guns. Maybe. But I think that WW3 won't happen in a long time.
deathopper
offline
deathopper
1,564 posts
Nomad

I completely agree with 1337Player it won't happened in a long time but I guess they will use super bombs you know bombs that are even more powerful than the nuclear bomb ( which means a dieses worse than cancer ) and tanks with laser and stuff like that.

cptbignuts12
offline
cptbignuts12
709 posts
Nomad

laser guns ion lizard, an ion lizard is a powerful rocket that has wheels you shoot it and goes really fast and then detonats in contact or with a button good againts tanks

Hypermnestra
offline
Hypermnestra
26,390 posts
Nomad

Not guns, not tanks, but bombs. Lots and lots of atomic or hydrogen bombs, or something of the sort.
And robot soldiers, if any soldiers at all.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

Laser guns, robots, awesome looking tanks, spaceships, etc... Basically anything futuristic.

BlackVortex
offline
BlackVortex
1,360 posts
Nomad

Computerssss obv.
Like that film where some hackers go into a military database thing and shut down an entire city, that can cause enough chaos and panic to make places destroy themselves, can't remember the name of the film tho.

BenTheBozer
offline
BenTheBozer
815 posts
Nomad

Why does everyone expect this to be futuristic? The last world wars were only 20 years apart from each other.

Joe96
offline
Joe96
2,226 posts
Nomad

I wouldn't like to think about a world war III.
But, tensions have been growing between America/allies and nations such as Venezuela, Communist dictators, the middle east, etc.

kitesarecool
offline
kitesarecool
42 posts
Farmer

probably a satellite that can fire lasers down at pinpointed locations, or send out probes or nukes or something. Probably plasma weapons, mor Harrier-like ships

Pazx
offline
Pazx
5,842 posts
Peasant

Hmm...

Is... Is it possible that people...

Kill each other...

With... Bullets?

knight_34
offline
knight_34
13,817 posts
Farmer

Why does everyone expect this to be futuristic? The last world wars were only 20 years apart from each other.


I have to agree. We could even be fighting another global war within our lifetimes. Think of the near future.
Griffin1997
offline
Griffin1997
5 posts
Nomad

it also depends on what the wars about if its for land,food water the i don't think they would use nukes but if its just to destroy then the country with the most bombs would win

MRWalker82
offline
MRWalker82
4,005 posts
Shepherd

I hope that none of the countries will use nuclear bombs. That's what started cancer.


Not true at all. Cancer is a naturally occurring condition. Cancer has, in all likelihood, been around as long as eukaryotes.
FinnDragon
offline
FinnDragon
993 posts
Blacksmith

Nukes most likely or then even more effective future mass-destruction weapons, like antimaterybomb,darkmatery/energybomb.

1337Player
offline
1337Player
1,766 posts
Peasant

Not true at all. Cancer is a naturally occurring condition. Cancer has, in all likelihood, been around as long as eukaryotes.

Hmm... then my science teacher lied to the whole class... Well, probably, most likely a lot of bombs will be used. Maybe a few sniper rifles.
Showing 1-15 of 33