ForumsGamesAge of War VS. Warfare 1944

7 2551
Kellinger
offline
Kellinger
158 posts
Nomad

which one do you think is best. I think Age of war is better but thats because its the first game i have played on this site.

  • 7 Replies
mnobodeddd
offline
mnobodeddd
392 posts
Nomad

In my opinion Age Of War is better because in Age Of War to me it's just more creative, fun to play, and it has a much bigger variety of units, difficulties, times, etc. while in Warfare 1944 you are limited to much more things in the game but it's a close call.

Kellinger
offline
Kellinger
158 posts
Nomad

if only they could give more options for warfare 1944. like a base and defences. mabye someone will make a game just for WW II and use the concept of age of war...... but then again it wouldn't be a long game becuase you can't expand on that topic much.

logantheking
offline
logantheking
254 posts
Scribe

I like Warfare because it is pretty well balanced and there are so many strategies you can use.

ubica88
offline
ubica88
2,188 posts
Nomad

Warfare 1944

sk8brder246
offline
sk8brder246
740 posts
Nomad

age of war is a bomb game but it is kinda boring if youve played it alot, warfare on the other hand, is fun no matter how many times you play because there are many differnet srategies you can use to defeat the nazis or americans

Fyrefox
offline
Fyrefox
2,120 posts
Farmer

I like them both a lot. I've played Warfare 1944 and Age of War countless times, but my vote would have to go to Warfare 1944. I like the graphics and the ability to pick teams and go through different campaigns.

Endscape
offline
Endscape
1,182 posts
Nomad

hmmmmm it is sad that Endscape has to even say this but 4 the slow people warfare is 7 times better opinion no... Fact yes.

Showing 1-7 of 7