But, I haven't played the Kinect or PS move, so I can't really say. I am kind of disappointed how Microsoft marketed Kinect as this supreme no need for controllers peripheral, you are "in the game" type thing and then it turns out to be mostly like the "eye toy". (Am I wrong though? I never used the Kinect what is it like?)
I think Kinect is the best. No annoying controllers needed to control your in-game player. Then comes the Move because it has been developed earlier so it can have some things improved over the Wii, although you look like a ****** with the light bulb on your controller. And Wii looses because graphics suck and the games are inorigninal (Wii Sports, Wii Sports resort, what comes next, Wii Sports Lazy *** Trainer xD)
I believe that Kinect isn't as practical as they're making it out to be. Are there any games that you can seriously play with just your body? The wii-remote and the ps2 move have buttons, and Kinect doesn't. I can't see myself becoming a fan of anything other than the potentially entertaining light-saber game
I think Kinect is the best. No annoying controllers needed to control your in-game player. Then comes the Move because it has been developed earlier so it can have some things improved over the Wii, although you look like a ****** with the light bulb on your controller. And Wii looses because graphics suck and the games are inorigninal (Wii Sports, Wii Sports resort, what comes next, Wii Sports Lazy *** Trainer xD)
You got all the reason. PrideRage, you need a merit for that comment. Wiimote is cool but kinect is better.
If you think about it, anything you do usually requires something that has buttons or levers. You drive, you can't do that without a wheel, shifting gears and what not.... Kinect may take away controllers and buttons, but it's trying to be too ahead of it's time and is doomed to be a big flop in the end. Only thing it could probably succeed in is "Friday Night Alone" for those Xbox Fanboys that....well you know... are too busy playing "Halo".
