harry potter 4: the goblet of fire. grrr... worst game ever. aespacially after the really good harry potter 3:the prisoner of azkaban. the gameplay was nice but thats it. it felt like an unfinished game allt he time
mine pwns you all, equestrian rider for the ps2. my sister loved it because it was about horses but i could see a bilion flaws. the jumping only worked half of the time, the graphics resembeled that of the n64 and worst of all, you can clearly see MOTION BLURS!
When I was younger I used to play Shrek games on PS2 and I thought it was great and today I see this is one of the worst games I have played and Harry Potter games are bad too.
turning point: fall of liberty. Worst Demo ever... EVER. It takes the concept of America being invaded by Nazis and TOTALLY butchers the idea with a paper-thin plot and a silent protagonist.
Teh graphics look like something from the original Xbox
The guns are quite unoriginal, a different shaped aiming piece on the aptly named "MP50" is the only difference between it and the legit "MP40"
Too many zeppelins. Trust me.
You don't just make a game and then go "oh ****, its really that bad", you expect it to be bad. And guess what? the developers KNEW that, and had the GALL to add MULTIPLAYER ACHIEVEMENTS. ****!!! I generally don't like multiplayer achievables (halo and battlefield excluded) and the fact that i could only get these by playing in a horrible game on a deserted server?? STAB ME!!
