ForumsWEPRA Big Picture

32 6939
cddm95ace
offline
cddm95ace
165 posts
Nomad

So I'm a Christian who believes that since I have the Holy Spirit inside of me I will go to heaven when I die, and if I don't, I go to hell. A lot of the people on the WEPR forums believe that nothing happens and we just cease to exist.

Now if I am right, that means that atheists and other similar ways of thinking are going to have a bad eternity. But if I'm wrong, then I might just be a fool in this world but the same will happen to me as everyone else. It seems that I have much less to lose. Just food for thought.

  • 32 Replies
cddm95ace
offline
cddm95ace
165 posts
Nomad

So, you say you would not mind devoting your life to something that might not exist and are perfectly alright talking to yourself when you pray?

In a way, yes. But I have to believe that that something does exist.

So obeying a deities every wish as a slave is not abusive, but not believing is somehow abusive?

I've never said that not believing is abusive, and I don't think the abusive slave master picture is well related to my relationship with God.

Einfach
offline
Einfach
1,448 posts
Nomad

Belief is not a choice and we have evidence against the existence of God.

Xzeno
offline
Xzeno
2,301 posts
Nomad

Belief is not a choice and we have evidence against the existence of God.
But we don't.
Einfach
offline
Einfach
1,448 posts
Nomad

But we don't.

Sorry - they have a lack of evidence, and we have Occam's razor and various and conclusive arguments.
314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

I don't think the abusive slave master picture is well related to my relationship with God.


Does your god not refer to you like a slave? Beats those he calls misbehaving? Order you to do things for him? All of these things have been seen true Yahweh's actions in the bible, so how does it not apply to him?
Xzeno
offline
Xzeno
2,301 posts
Nomad

Sorry - they have a lack of evidence, and we have Occam's razor and various and conclusive arguments.
That's not evidence. That's an appeal to ignorance. You can't prove a negative.

I'm not arguing for or against the existence of God. Whether or not Occam's razor and the arguments for atheism hold water are beyond the scope of my argument. I merely took issue with your statement.
Einfach
offline
Einfach
1,448 posts
Nomad

You can't prove a negative.

Can you prove anything except the existence of the mind in some form?
Xzeno
offline
Xzeno
2,301 posts
Nomad

Can you prove anything except the existence of the mind in some form?
I'll take that as an admission of defeat.
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

The gullibility of faith is a defining part of a relationship.


Yeah I know that's one of the things that makes it so foolish.

But I have to believe that that something does exist.


Why do you have to?

I've never said that not believing is abusive, and I don't think the abusive slave master picture is well related to my relationship with God.


If it was really a non abusive relationship God wouldn't need the threat of hell looming over your head if you didn't want that relationship.
Xzeno
offline
Xzeno
2,301 posts
Nomad

Epicurus, 200 BCE.
I hope that wasn't directed at me.

As for more general comments on the thread, logic and reason are nothing but a shadow. An interpretation of reality, a vehicle of everlasting meaning. Religious indoctrination is dangerous, but so too is the militant nihilism so prevalent on threads like this. The atheists are so quick to hate what they do not understand, yet they call Christians the ignorant ones.

Calling someone ugly won't make you pretty, calling someone stupid won't make you smart, reciting a platitude won't make you free, and calling a belief irrational won't bring you closer to the truth.

Religion may not be the path for you. It's not for everyone. If you don't understand it, let it go. Don't try to undermine it for others. Find your way.
Asherlee
offline
Asherlee
5,001 posts
Shepherd

cddm, Pascal's Wager is what that is called that you are describing. Unfortunately, it has a lot of criticism major fallacy to it.

cddm95ace
offline
cddm95ace
165 posts
Nomad

Belief is not a choice

How can it not be? I can choose to believe in God, as I am. Nothing is forcing me to believe.

If it was really a non abusive relationship God wouldn't need the threat of hell looming over your head if you didn't want that relationship.

There is also a reward that is much more motivating than the punishment. Instead of being scared into it by hell, I am motivated by a positive desire to be in heaven.

Does your god not refer to you like a slave? Beats those he calls misbehaving? Order you to do things for him? All of these things have been seen true Yahweh's actions in the bible, so how does it not apply to him?

Nope, He doesn't do that. Give me some Biblical references that clearly illustrate that. The closest he gets to that is the shepard/sheep relationship. He asks obedience, but doesn't yell orders.

skarl
offline
skarl
250 posts
Nomad

lack of evidence is no evidence that something isn't true.

I think that Believe is not a choice too.
I can't think, 'hey, today I'm going to believe in god, and tomorrow not.' at least, I wouldn't call that believe. god chooses his herds.

MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

lack of evidence is no evidence that something isn't true.


Though it is reasonable to assume it doesn't if no evidence exists.
valkery
offline
valkery
1,255 posts
Nomad

Though it is reasonable to assume it doesn't if no evidence exists.


What if there is reasonable evidence, but you can't prove it? Kinda like you try to prove the big Bang with math, and you can prove most of the way back to point zero, but you can't prove point zero. Even if there is evidence to support your theory, you still can't prove anything. It may be reasonable to think that everything was created from nothing and that humans were created by it raining on rocks for a couple million years, or it might be reasonable to think that an invisible man with magical powers created everything from dust in one day. Either of these can be debated, but both seem kinda silly to me.
Showing 16-30 of 32