ForumsWEPRRonald Reagan

56 15804
Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

I will post what it says in my book, and I want you guys to post what you think about it.

Deregulation

As part of his promise to reduce government and "get the government off the backs of the American people," President Reagan pursued a policy of deregulation. This meant cutting the rules and regulations government agencies placed on businesses. Under President Reagan, for example, the Department of Transportation wrote new rules for automobile exhaust systems and safety measures that were easier for car manufacturers to meet.

Reaganomics

Deregulation and his court appointments showed President Reagan's commitment to a conservative view of government. It was his economic policies, however, that formed the core of the "Reagan Revolution." Reagan believed that lower taxes would allow individuals and corporations to invest in new businesses. Because a tax cut would mean less income, Reagan also called for less government spending. Supporters called Reagan's economic policy supply-side economics because it proposed to stimulate the economy by increasing the supply of goods and services. The president's critics ridiculed the policy as "Reaganomics."

In 1981 Congress lowered taxes and slashed nearly $40 billion from federal programs such as school lunches, student aid, welfare, low-income housing, and food stamps. Critics charged that these cuts hurt both the working poor and unemployed people. Supporters argued that Reaganomics would boost the economy, helping everybody in the long run.

While Reagan cut domestic programs, he pushed for sharp increases in military spending. The president declared that the Soviet threat made it necessary to build up the military.

Government Debt

With higher defense spending and lower taxes, the government spent more money than it collected in revenue. It had to borrow money to make up the difference. This borrowing increased the federal debtâ"the amount of money owed by the government. Between 1970 and 1980, the federal debt had grown from $381 to $909 billion. By 1990 the debt had jumped to $3.2 trillion.

Recession and Recovery

President Reagan's new economic policies seemed to falter when a serious recession began early in his first term. However, the economy recovered a year later and began to boom.

In 1983 the economy began a long, steady rise. Businesses expanded, and the high jobless rate of 1982 declined. Investors showed confidence in the economy with a boom in stock trading.

http://www.mhln.com/ob/assets/00083001/jpg/00083363.jpg

The federal debt continued to grow as well. In 1985 Congress tried to halt growth of the debt by passing the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act. The act set a series of targets for eliminating the federal budget deficit by 1991. If Congress and the president could not agree on voluntary spending cuts, the law called for automatic spending cuts to balance the budget. The provision for automatic cuts did not apply to all areas of the budget, however, so it had limited success.


Well, what do you think?
  • 56 Replies
thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

What Reagan did was get 3 guns.


Like he should have.
skarl
offline
skarl
250 posts
Nomad

having three guns is not helping you, for one bullet can be enough to kill you.

Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

Like he should have.


Why should he have done that? They were a threat, but having more guns doesn't mean we will be less dead.
thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

Why should he have done that? They were a threat, but having more guns doesn't mean we will be less dead.


Well our domestic programs don't matter either if we're dead.
skarl
offline
skarl
250 posts
Nomad

they may prevent us from dieing.

thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

they may prevent us from dieing.

I lol'd at the part where you implied that socialized healthcare would prevent a nuclear missile from killing us.
Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

Well our domestic programs don't matter either if we're dead.


Of course they don't, but we wouldn't be dead anyway.
thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

Of course they don't, but we wouldn't be dead anyway

Thanks to increased military spending.
skarl
offline
skarl
250 posts
Nomad

I didn't say that anywhere at this forum. (and not off the forum, for the matter of fact.)

talking, diplomacy can prevent wars. that's what I meant.

and healthcare can actually reduce the sequels, like cancer.

Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

Thanks to increased military spending.


We wouldn't be dead even if we didn't increase military spending.
thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

We wouldn't be dead even if we didn't increase military spending


I lol'd at the part where you implied winning the arms race wasn't vital to our survival.
skarl
offline
skarl
250 posts
Nomad

I lol'd at the part where you implied winning the arms race wasn't vital to our survival.


actually, one big part of the race was bluffing. like: project starwars, for example. it never took place, but the USSR was scared to death.
thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

actually, one big part of the race was bluffing


Yeah of course we weren't going to nuke them, but we had to bluff and act like our mind wasn't made up yet.
skarl
offline
skarl
250 posts
Nomad

just what I said.

just now what you said.

huh?

MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

[quote]Well our domestic programs don't matter either if we're dead.[/quot]

Kids can't get a proper education (which I thought was an issue you had from the last thread) and people are on the street starving, but at least we have a strong military.

Showing 16-30 of 56