I'm willing to bet that this thread was already made, but I checked the fiirst 20 pages, couldn't find it, so here it is.
My vote goes to Call Of Duty. I like the feel of it more than HALO, the health there is a lot more limited than in HALO, you gte a mini-map, and if you dont want that you can go to Hardcore mode. You get killstreaks as well plus perks to help you out.
HALO, yes its good of course. But its a bit too cartoony for my taste, the amount of health you get is ridiculuos, plus the driving from AIs suck. The one thing I'll givw to HALO is that it has a lvl creator where as CoD doesnt. if CoD had that, then HALO gets pwned.
Also, CoD has better sales than HALO on the 360, and get this, it's not even exclusive for the 360 where as HALO is.
Halo was my first Xbox LIVE game. I played it for who knows how long. But when I got my first CoD game (World At War), I loved it too. They're pretty different from each other.
Halo has no killstreaks, one type of weapon for each category (one assault rifle, one sniper, one handgun etc.), a much different storyline than CoD, and it takes more shots to kill with a regular weapon.
CoD, on the other hand, has killstreaks and a much wider variety of weapons. Also the gameplays of each game are totally different.
Halo. I played that game first and liked it a lot better than Call of duty.
What are your reasons for liking it better than Call Of Duty? You should include them instead of just putting half bit post.
I prefer Call Of Duty, even though the campaign mode is short - I don't like Halo's campaign since they took some characters that were in Halo 1 & 2 out. It just doesn't appeal to me anymore.
I also like playing Call Of Duty online instead of playing Halo online since on Halo their weapons aren't realistic & I don't like their maps when playing online.
