i searched on a few websites and lots of people agree that there is a god even famous people like Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein agreed that there has to be a god and ill past a couple of articles which you should read and see for yourself that God exists..
1) This is an appeal to authority.
2) Albert Einstein did not, though Newton did.
On the contrary, the Earth, Sun, Moon, Stars, and others always revolve for billions of years without single crash.
Planetary bodies collide all the time.
For billions of years until now the Earth never bump into the Sun, and the Sun never collides with the Moon.
This is a tautology. Yes, the earth has never crashed into the sun and the moon has never crashed into the earth. If they had, we wouldn't be here to say they had.
Without God, the Controller of the Universe, none of these would happen.
Last time I checked, physics was responsible for that. Gravity and all.
Everything is in order because there is God who controls everything. Allah has put orbit for each of those things. If we really think about it then we will know that God exist.
This is a non sequitur. You are making a random leap in saying a god is responsible for this phenomenon, much less your particular god.
If we really think about it, then we have no evidence of any god's existence, especially yours, where specific claims can be disproved.
ââ¦Lo! Those on whom ye call beside Allah will never create a fly though they combine together for the purpose. And if the fly took something from them, they could not rescue it from him. So weak are (both) the seeker and the sought!â [Quran 22:73]
*Facepalm* There's actually a VERSE of this ridiculous argument? Sigh.
Hearing that, they realized that they trapped with their own statement.
Uh, no. A tree randomly falling, then randomly losing its branches, then randomly carving itself out into a boat, is VASTLY different than the universe following natural laws.
âSo, though we cannot see the pain does not mean that the pain does not exist.
We can see pain. Under an fMRI, we can see where the brain's neurons fire from stimulus. Same for everything else, because our brain is responsible for how we interpret everything.
So yes, we can see pain, and we can prove pain exists. This has nothing to do with a god.
Allah tells us that He is Pure, Loving, and absolutely Just in every respect. He says that He is the Best of Judges. He also tells us that the life that we are in is a test. He has created all the things that exist and He has created all that happens as well. There is nothing in this existence except what He has created. He also says in the Quran that He created evil (although He is not evil). He is using this as one of the many tests for us.
He tells us he's '
ure.'
He tells us he's 'loving.'
He tells us he's 'just.'
Then he goes on to set up all of his creations for failure and sends a good majority of them to eternal torture for being imperfect. Sorry, I'm not seeing the love or justness.
Why do we even need to be tested?
We can look to the things that He has created and the way that He cares for things and sustains us, to know that there is no doubt of His existence.
You can look at anything, and say something made it without evidence. Literally, this is a baseless claim. Anyone can look at the same thing and say whatever they want. A ghost did it. Aliens. God. Allah. Yaweh, Shiva, Zeus, or any other supernatural force.
Except we have no evidence for any of that, and you're just saying whatever you want. You don't 'know.' You're just ascribing your preference.
Think about this the next time that you are looking up at the moon or the stars on a clear night; could you drop a drinking glass on the sidewalk and expect that it would hit the ground and on impact it would not shatter, but it would divide up into little small drinking glasses, with iced tea in them? Of course not.
This has absolutely nothing to do with the topic and is ridiculous.
And then consider if a tornado came through a junkyard and tore through the old cars; would it leave behind a nice new Mercedes with the engine running and no parts left around? Naturally not.
Just keep throwing those watchmakers fallacies out ad nauseum. We'll eventually stop responding to them and you can make-believe you've won a point, because we're tired of repeating ourselves.
After considering all of the above, how could we look to the universe above us through a telescope or observe the molecules in a microscope and then think that all of this came about as a result of a "big bang" or some "accident?"
Argument from incredulity.
This bit of knowledge could never be known to humans before the invention and use of microscopes.
Yes it could have. Bees aren't microscopic. We can see them with our own eyes.
