Having only played Call of Duty (Unless you want to include older Medal of Honor games, Rising Sun ftw!), I suppose i can't really make much of a judgement. However is the gameplay of MoH that I've seen is anything to go by then I have to say in terms of replay value, shraper graphics and an overall more addictive experience, CoD. in terms of the community, MoH wins hands down. These days I can't even play MW2 without running into a One Man Army Pro noob tuber, and Black Ops is full to the brim of 12 year olds that think the 74u is the greatest weapon ever created.
It's obvious that call of duty wins, so people think it's stupid to mention what is already obvious.
Look at the Call of Duty Threads. Now back at me. Now the CoD threads. Now at me. That's right. There's so dang many of them, lord knows why no one posts on ones like this anymore O:O
/end sarcasm
Neither win, I'm fed up of First Person Shooters taking the high road. CoD has had so many problems from the start, solving and making more and more, it's rediculous that they haven't gotten a grip on their money-whoring scheme.
Yep, it is that. Why do you think any game that is made by any company gets the "Call of Duty" name? Or that one is released every year with what mays well be new things that equal to a minor-content patch?
MoH? Never played it and I don't need to - the Multiplayer was made by DICE and I've seen small bits of it. MoH > CoD. Battlefield > MoH
