I think that top list shouldn't be limited to top 100, now that there are over 1 000 000 accounts, it would be nice that there is list from 100-200, 200-300, 300-400, 400-500.
And another thing - some people like to go through the rankings and spam the users profiles with 'good job' 'how'd you get so many points' and sometimes even things to insult the person like 'get off the site' 'go do something else' etc. .
I think it would be a horrible idea to make the list longer than what it already is.
some people like to go through the rankings and spam the users profiles with 'good job' 'how'd you get so many points' and sometimes even things to insult the person like 'get off the site' 'go do something else' etc. .
I'm agreeing with Matrix because looking at your profile, i can only assume you didn't play the 1600 games you rated considering you only have 200 comments.
Well, i probably didn't play all of them properly, but im member for many years now, and commenting is a sort of a problem, because i'm Serbian and i don't really know what to write, my English is good in ways of spelling, but i'm not so good with creating sentences, and bad comments get deleted, i did comment for a while, but now i simply stopped.
I didn't notice your join date, since you have been here that long i can believe you actually played those games and your reason for your low amount of comments sounds like its true. Sorry for that, its just that I have seen many users just rate games without playing them, to gain AP.
i'm ranked 501#, and when i get to 4**, it would be nice to see just how much am i behind the next on the list
I'd like to add in - the points will be completely different for AG3 and I don't think that they'll have this leader-board on there.
Also, AG3 is really close to being launched - so they're not going to put any updates on the current site unless it's absolutely necessary.
its just that I have seen many users just rate games without playing them
That's something that you don't know for a fact, to be honest.
If someone has been here for a month, then I can understand that it would be almost impossible to rate 2,000 games. But if someone has been here for a few months, then it's not.
That's something that you don't know for a fact, to be honest.
If someone has been here for a month, then I can understand that it would be almost impossible to rate 2,000 games. But if someone has been here for a few months, then it's not.
And that's why i can understand why Kusic has rated so many games. When people are pretty new here and make completely unintelligible posts, I can only assume if they have rated 1000+ games that they are just rating them without playing.
You have more points than me and are only rated 501... lol. Wait, your one of those annoying game rating spammers, not annoying, just don't contribute.
well, about those points.... i'm member since 2009 and i have less points than man who created his account less than 1 month ago !!
I made my account in June but didn't use it till early December 2010. I have more AP then you and I have never spammed. I just go on the forums and make good posts. That is how you get more AP.
And on the actual fact of the longer top list... You can already see what rank you are on your main page. I can see the reason you want a longer top list (so you can see how many points you need), but I think it's unnecessary, plus with AG3 coming out soon...
