during recess at school a kid walked up to the house and tried to pet a dog that had bitten a teacher before and the teacher supervising us yelled at him so 2 kids dragged the kid who was hated in the class and 1 ran off and 1 tried to push him in the yard the hated kid slapped the kid trying to push him in the yard and the kid trying to push the hated kid punched him and chased him off school grounds so do you think the kid who approached the dog should be held responsible?
I can read past the lack of punctuation, spacing and capitalization but the continuity fail between the first kid and the hated kid being dragged by two others makes no sense. You make it look as if the two kids dragged the hated kid because the supervisor yelled at the first kid. Is that the case?
Anyway, the first kid sounds like an idiot and the two kids are both ninnyhammers.
Kid 1 should not be held responsible for what kids 2, 3 and 4 did, kids 2 and 3 should be punished, and kid 4 should not be punished, since he hit in self-defense.
i agree with that except for one thing... i dont think kid one even deserves to be in that story XD.
kid 2 stopped dragging kid 4
why did he ran away anyway? because he knew he is going to get slapped??? anyway that kid is even more stupid then the kid who stayed and punched him and both kid 2 and 3 should get punished
Guys what about kid 5? He may have tempted the kid to leave school in the first place being ethically wrong. Kid 1 may believe he was doing the right thing.
Was he double dog dared? You know you can't back down from a double dog dare.
Where kids 2+3 abusing their power by dragging the kid in the first place? They could have a lawsuit on their hands.
COMPLETELY CONFUSING!!! but from what i understand, the kid going to the dog should not be punished, the two kids dragging 1st kid should be punished and the teacher should mind her own buisness
ok i sorta understnad more now. kid 1 should only be punished if he left school grounds which it sounds like he did since he went to the neightbor's house and unless it is on school grounds (which I dought) kid 1 should not be punished,
sorry if that waz confusing I know it was a little when I read back through it
I think it';s the two kids that tried to push the kid who got yelled at in the first place should get in trouble. Not the kid who already got yelled at. But the two kids the tried to get the other kid killed.