AGS Steam Games

Forums → Games → Modern Warfare 3

12 3162
Owen135731
offline
Owen135731
2,123 posts
Peasant

So yeah. This is pretty much exactly like what I did for Black Ops (for those of you that saw that :3)
But anyways, this topic is about Modern Warfare 3. I love me some call of duty. I will be posting screen shots, dissecting videos, and posting all pertinent information.

First of all though:

Please don't say things like
"OMGz I herd this was in space?!?!." Don't. Read up before you speak please.

Anyways, Kotaku just did a major leak.

Multiplayer


Single Player

The first link has a really amazing photo gallery. If anyone wants, I can list off the weapons. :3

The second one is all about the story. Please note that it contains Spoilers

The End. Good day.

  • 12 Replies
Highfire
offline
Highfire
3,025 posts
Nomad

After reading the links. This is gonna be crap. What is it? Hype. They're using the CoD name and promising a revolution of its franchise which has already passed and failed - twice. Also, guns? And? Sorry Owen, but really now, people care more for dang Tomahawks or Crossbows than guns.

The game will indefinitely feature some sort of bullcrap which shouldn't happen - if it was CoD4 remade I would be happy, but still it shouldn't be what I would expect something 4 games later! I mean COME ON! There is NO advance in the CoD franchise, only fetid decay.

If they ramp this up to what it should be, which is almost impossible, then good. If not? Meh, no surprise - I'm only glad that it keeps the retards occupied.

- H

jroyster22
offline
jroyster22
755 posts
Peasant

I have to be honest, I am very excited for MW3!!!

GhostOfMatrix
offline
GhostOfMatrix
15,595 posts
Bard

I mainly play the Call Of Duty games for the online gameplay. The campaign mode is short, I've completed all of them in about four-eight hours. If Modern Warfare three has a longer campaign mode, then I'll like it.

Mooooooo
offline
Mooooooo
528 posts
Nomad

Those links you provided are so wrong. Infinity Ward officially announced that in MW3, you will play the PREQUEL of MW2 (timeline BEFORE MW2), and you will play as Ghost. And yeah, MW3 was announced on May 7th, and it is scheduled to release in November, this year.

Owen135731
offline
Owen135731
2,123 posts
Peasant

I'm only glad that it keeps the retards occupied.


If i have to be retarted to enjoy COD, then that's fine with me :3

Infinity Ward officially announced that in MW3, you will play the PREQUEL of MW2 (timeline BEFORE MW2), and you will play as Ghost.


IW has officially announced nothing.
Highfire
offline
Highfire
3,025 posts
Nomad

If i have to be retarted to enjoy COD, then that's fine with me :3

I'm not saying you're retarded,

I'm talking about those ones who rage and whine, usually spoilt, a prime example would be my brother-in-law, except dumber. Then again his intelligence and the fact he still plays the trash (in my opinion) can show how idiotic people can become. :/

I choose my words wisely, Owen, I said the, that's doesn't apply to all CoD's playerbase

Does the "retarded" part apply to you? I don't know.

- H
Owen135731
offline
Owen135731
2,123 posts
Peasant

There is NO advance in the CoD franchise, only fetid decay.


TBH, very few series are advancing anymore - And in COD's case, though the gameplay is extremely similar between games, the game is quality each and every time. There are very few games I know of that run at 60 FPS.

Battlefield isn't exactly advancing either. Sure. It looks pretty. But you shoot stuff, drive stuff, etc. All first person shooters nowadays are the same of the previous. And games that try to change the pace and format (Brink is a great example) get hammered by reviews and inevitably 'fail' because of it.
koolkylekool
offline
koolkylekool
247 posts
Nomad

Battlefield isn't exactly advancing either. Sure. It looks pretty. But you shoot stuff, drive stuff, etc. All first person shooters nowadays are the same of the previous. And games that try to change the pace and format (Brink is a great example) get hammered by reviews and inevitably 'fail' because of it.


Wait, what?

Battlefield isn't exactly advancing either. Sure. It looks pretty. But you shoot stuff, drive stuff, etc.


No wai, you didn't just...

Battlefield isn't exactly advancing either.


Really? 'Cuz this thing called Battlefield 2 changed the series, then this thing called Bad Company changed the FPS Genre's gameplay, then this thing called Bad Company 2 changed team combat overall, and Battlefield 3 looks to be one of the most realistic FPS's out there. Get your facts straight, *******.
Gstroy
offline
Gstroy
482 posts
Nomad

Infinity Ward officially announced that in MW3, you will play the PREQUEL of MW2 (timeline BEFORE MW2), and you will play as Ghost.
IW is only labeled as working on it so people will buy it, its all Sledgehammer and Raven. IW is now an even crappier company than they did before, it was good back in the MW days, then MW2 came out. Worst COD ever...
Highfire
offline
Highfire
3,025 posts
Nomad

the game is quality each and every time.

MW2 lacks dedicated servers, uses plenty of unbalanced things and ultimately is a step down from CoD4.

Black Ops has serious technical FPS and hit registration problems with poorer graphics than MW2.

That, and the new things they bring in each game amounts to a content pack worth of stuff. Not a dang new game.

Battlefield isn't exactly advancing either. Sure. It looks pretty. But you shoot stuff, drive stuff, etc. All first person shooters nowadays are the same of the previous. And games that try to change the pace and format (Brink is a great example) get hammered by reviews and inevitably 'fail' because of it.

Hey.
Here's an advance.
Here's another.

Get your facts straight, *******.

I enjoy seeing your passion koolkylekool, but try and keep it low, please.

Oh, and if you want more advances, that are funnily enough better than CoD, you can go find an Indie Developers FPS.

Furthermore, Battlefield has barely reached its full potential, imagine actual teamwork being applied in a form of eSports or something?

Plus, <3 the music of Battlefield 2 (which better be present in Battlefield 3).

All videos above this statement (and in this post) are YouTube, thanks.

Now. If you want to see some in-depth awesomesauce of how BF3 could advance (unlike what MW3 has shown - probably because it's not that great in comparison), then I suggest you look at this.

Also from YouTube.

Oh, might I add that music from Crysis 2 is indeed awesome as well.
Spoiler alert by the way, I could've found the music by itself but in context it is indeed awesome. Again - YouTube is your friend.

- H
ChillzMaster
offline
ChillzMaster
1,434 posts
Nomad

Highfire... will you marry me?

besides that...

Battlefield isn't exactly advancing either. Sure. It looks pretty. But you shoot stuff, drive stuff, etc. All first person shooters nowadays are the same of the previous. And games that try to change the pace and format (Brink is a great example) get hammered by reviews and inevitably 'fail' because of it.


Borderlands? Fallout 3/New Vegas? Bulletstorm? DUKE NUKEM FOREVER???

and what do you mean Battlefield isnt moving forward? B2 was an excellent game that defined class-based online shooters. Bad Co.1 blew us all away with the superb Frostbite engine, and then came back with an updated Frostbite in Bad Co. 2!

Battlefield 3 looks like a friggin' documentary how good it looks! combined with the Frostbite 2.0 engine, who knows what DICE will accomplish?

Not to mention that CoD4 was an excellent step forward in the FPS genre and raised the bar for shooters everywhere, but every game afterwards has been just trolling along the X-axis, never going up the Y-axis. Sure we get different killstreak rewards in some games, but IW and Treyarch have been keeping the industry down with their same-ness. There's no y-axis movement in innovation, gameplay, anything!

Look at Just Cause to Just Cause 2, or, more popular, Assassin's Creed to Assassin's Creed 2. How about last gen's Jak and Daxter to Jak 2. There was nothing wrong with the first one, but Naughty dog came around, improved gameplay, and made an overall better game in the end. Dead Rising to Dead Rising 2? GTA 2 to GTA 3? Resident Evil 3 to Resident Evil 4? Mass Effect to Mass Effect 2?

All the developers for the above games took their some-flawed-more-than-others games and made a better sequel in the end, because they wanted to move along the Y-axis in quality.

Let's look at Raven, who's co-crafting the Singleplayer with an Infinity Ward who lost half its good members thanks to Activision.

Quake 4? no. Wolfenstein 2009? no. Turok? no. A history of sub-par FPS's does not bode well for MW3's newest developer.

Remember how Microsoft took a handful of its guys and made 343 to handle Halo? well, imagine that with Activision, only, instead of being a group of developers making the multiplayer aspect of MW3, it will be a group of publishers who won't innovate because they know the cries of "four legs good, two legs bad" still exit MW fans's (LIKE YOU) mouth, engorging in the same multiplayer experience and falling ever deeper into the Skinner Box's monotony.
Highfire
offline
Highfire
3,025 posts
Nomad

ChillzMaster... will you marry me?

- H

Showing 1-12 of 12