I don't want to pray or believe in something who may not exist. The proof for religions are too weak to be called fact.
There are actually only two things who are fact here in universe. 1: You can't know anything for sure except these facts. 2: Everything can happen.
So don't make any conclusions of how it must be.
My vision is then to create an own religion; the Happycism. If you ask me what the meaning with life is; I will answer to be happy. To have a great life you enjoyed. That's what the Happycism will do; make people happy.
If you want to join; it's great. You can have this religion and another if you want.
You don't need a religion to be happy. Also, religion includes some kind of supernatural thingies. What does yours include? A happy-god, or happy-ghosts? Sounds basically like a nice thing, but is kinda unnecessary
There are no Gods or ghosts in Buddhism either. Just saying.
I never said religion has to include belief in a deity but I'm pretty sure there is belief in supernatural or spiritual things in buddhism too, right? And what have I written exactly?
My vision is then to create an own religion; the Happycism. If you ask me what the meaning with life is; I will answer to be happy. To have a great life you enjoyed. That's what the Happycism will do; make people happy.
If you aren't worshiping a God or anything of that nature, then you don't have a religion. What you proposing is a way of life that will probably never be realized.
The proof for religions are too weak to be called fact.
My vision is then to create an own religion; the Happycism.
I don't believe in your religion, there is no proof it is right.
There are actually only two things who are fact here in universe. 1: You can't know anything for sure except these facts. 2: Everything can happen.
I would replace 2: with I exist, as there are things that can't happen.
My vision is then to create an own religion; the Happycism. If you ask me what the meaning with life is; I will answer to be happy. To have a great life you enjoyed. That's what the Happycism will do; make people happy.
Sounds like a nice basis for a religion but I don't see why one would be required. In fact making it a religion could ultimately lead to a corruption of the core tenants. So it might serve better as a form of philosophy.
Might I just say that religious terms are often used in very specific moral or emotional views. They're more powerful than common terminology because the essence of faith and spirituality taints them (not saying that's a bad thing).
