Here's a sticky thread to put achievement-based ideas and discussion.
Our plan is to engage game developers to send us periodic information about your game play, such as how many castles you've toppled in Crush the Castle, or how many times your dinosaur jumped in Treadmillasaurus Rex, etc. and that these pieces of information would accumulate to award you 'achievements' on AG3.
We're actively designing and building the achievement system right now, so as we have information, we'll share it here, but we're welcome to listen to ideas and feedback along the way.
I think patrick2001 has a good idea. I like how on Kongregate, you can earn badges when you play a game, then you get points based on how hard it is.
You got me confused with JeffK3, so I will quote the idea in question then provide my opinion on it.
I think in AG v3 you should get medals for being a certain rank in AG V2.
I think that has already been discussed, and I don't think there will be any AG3 AP for AG2 rank, though there might be a non-scoring legacy achievement.
Will only games coming out after the release of AG3 have the Achievements or all of the games will?
Not all games will have achievements because the option to have them is up to the developer. Also, existing games can have achievements if the developer chooses to include them.
If you have already played a game in AG2 and did something that would give you an achievement in AG3 would you get it or would you have to play the game again?
I think you would have to play the game again and earn the achievement.
If you add acheivments, you should add more levels to reach.
I think the ranking system itself will change, and there is a discussion thread here.
I actually like the Achievements idea its something new for all Agv2 users to experience plus we knew ahead of time when the new players of AGv3 wont and will not know as much as we do now.
we knew ahead of time when the new players of AGv3 wont and will not know as much as we do now.
I'm sure there will be a way for new users to learn how achievements work on AG3. Therefore, I don't think there will be an advantage to having come from AG2. However, it will be easy to identify users from AG2 with legacy achievements.
i agree with blkask, there should be achievments for certain amounts of posts
I agree with jaketheace321 agreeing with blkask, there should be achievements for certain amounts of posts
I disagree with both of you because I think achievements will only be for games in which the developer chooses to include achievements. Also, simply agreeing with another user does not contribute to the thread and can be considered spam.
I disagree with both of you because I think achievements will only be for games in which the developer chooses to include achievements. Also, simply agreeing with another user does not contribute to the thread and can be considered spam.
[quote]I disagree with both of you because I think achievements will only be for games in which the developer chooses to include achievements. Also, simply agreeing with another user does not contribute to the thread and can be considered spam.
Your opinion means nothing to me, Patrick.[/quote]
Do not defend your own spam. Agreeing with another user without adding anything extra is considered spam. As proof, Devoidless once made this comment on my profile:
Fer realz, you gotta stop nitpicking and then spamming with "do what the above post says." If you can't think up a decent post, think harder.
It is therefore stupid to call my opinion meaningless since I added some actual contribution.
