I'm sure by now, a lot of you have played both assasins creed brotherhood, and splintercell conviction. there are two questions I want to ask. which game was better, and which one would win in a fist fight. in my opinion, assasins creed was a better game, and Ezio could wipe the floor with sam.
Sam's stealth is about not being seen, Ezio's stealth is about blending in with the crowd, beeing seen but not being noticed. Hiding in plain sight, so to speak. Ezio's impossible to defeat in melee combat, his fighting skills are unrealistic, so I have no doubt he'd kick Sam's ***. However, Sam is a lot better at hiding.
Sam has guns, is stealthy, and has great fighting skills. Ezio has melee weapons, is stealthy, and has great fighting skills. In Combat, I think Ezio would win, but if not a fist fight, Sam would win.
I think ezio wins. He just spawns dust in his hand and throws it as sam and then does some kind of unrealistic move on him so he lies crying on the ground and eventually died. And i think that the older splinter cell's were enjoyable but a few year ago's they have kind of dies for me
In a fist fight Ezio would easily win.In a hiding competition Sam would inch it and in a find and kill I say 50/50.Together they would be an Awesome killing team.
i though assasinz creed was a better game tbh, i never really cared for splinter cell- especially the hippi-ish "dont kill the terrorists" which got ver old very fast. in a straight fight i think ezio would definatley win, but of cource sam fisher has access to guns if it isnt a fist fight
