It's just like a game of darts but instead of a darts they're using air-strikes and instead of a dart board it's a guy called Gaddafi and it isn't called darts but 'internationally-mandated military action' which isn't a very good title for a game, really, it's not that catchy.
yes anyways, they are supposedly not aiming for him, they are either incredibly poor shots or they are breaking the mandate, I mean they are meant to be protecting civilians, how does bombing his compound protect civilians, maybe Gadaffi hase a death ray, but still I hope they do hit him, we could do with out another mad despot
I think that the UN should write another "firmly-worded" letter to Ghaddafi. That always seems to help them resolve conflicts...
That or a carpet bomb of the entire Tripoli area, however that could lead to collateral damage.
Better yet, just give the rebels whatever they need, and point them in the general direction of Ghaddafi. Either the rebels, or every single insane person in America.
[/quote] Better yet, just give the rebels whatever they need, and point them in the general direction of Ghaddafi. The last Rebels the US gave weapons to turned into the Taliban.
Qwerty's idea is legit. Instead of risking collateral damage and wasting expensive gas, airtime of bombers, payment towards army, and manufacturing of bomb fees -- just hire some undercover boss-operative for 1.2Mill to pop Ghaddafi, whilst recording everything from a camera that floats above his head -- in order to see if anything in games like Assasin's Creed is true or not.
On a completely unrelated side note:
The prequel to COD12 can be Call of Duty 11: NATO vs. the WARSAW PACT.
The last Rebels the US gave weapons to turned into the Taliban. and a few times befor that. it resulted in 3 even bigger wars.
Thats moot really, although true, I see no way in which these rebels could turn nasty to us in the forseeable future, they have no strong or fun****etal political or religious ideoligies, simply fredom from tyranny.
