Maybe AG should have a list of games that have been rated or have not been rated per user. That way, one can see which games they've rated versus the ones they haven't rated. How about it?
I believe this is already implemented, but you're gonna have to catch up with cormyn on that one. I admit, it's a good idea, and I'm glad it might be considered on AG3. Because I need to know these things to get these points ya see. It would be very reliable, but considering there is over 11,000 games, it would be a big system and may have to be ruled down. We'll see though
We can most likely tell if they didn't play if the comment is "I don't like it". Maybe users should be authorized to give reasons for their comment.
Marking comments as spam is beside the point. I'm talking about the points given just for rating the game, comment free. After all, you don't have to comment on a game.
[quote]It would be very reliable, but considering there is over 11,000 games, it would be a big system and may have to be ruled down.
Where did you get that number? I can't remember offhand but there is just over 2000 games on AG so your a little high there.[/quote]
There have been about 11,000 submission attempts, but only about 2,000 were actually accepted. Anyway, I think 2,000 games is too big for a rated/not rated system.
Maybe AG should have a list of games that have been rated or have not been rated per user. That way, one can see which games they've rated versus the ones they haven't rated. How about it?
Well... For one thing, you just want that, so you can make sure you haven't missed any games that you can rate just for the points.
in AG3, i believe i saw somewhere (i may be wrong), but i don't think that you will be able to get Armor Points for rating games, so your idea wont go through anyway. (if its true. Remember, i may be wrong.)
in AG3, i believe i saw somewhere (i may be wrong), but i don't think that you will be able to get Armor Points for rating games, so your idea wont go through anyway. (if its true. Remember, i may be wrong.)
I hope so. It's so annoying for people to get points for doing nothing but clicking random ratings. Although there should be a way to get points by playing games...
Why would we need that? For rating games one after the other and spamming armor game points?
No. It would show what flash games you haven't played. I don't think anyone has the patience to go through all those pages of flash games looking for games you haven't played. This would be much more convenient.
No, it's not implemented and probably never will be.
Well... For one thing, you just want that, so you can make sure you haven't missed any games that you can rate just for the points.
If you don't have solid proof that she wants that, then don't post what you just posted. Quit trying to think you know what's going on in people's minds.
I'd like to add in before people rage, yes, if people do get AP for rating flash games in AG3, it will be easier to get them. However, I think I read somewhere in the AG3 sub-forum that you'll have to play the game for a certain amount of time before you can rate it. Another thing, as stated before, it would be convenient to know which flash games you haven't played nor rated.
Quit trying to think you know what's going on in people's minds.
You don't think anyone rates games without playing them? It's a problem that I wish could be addressed. She may or may not have meant to truly have a way to filter games, but that's sadly how the feature will be used by many.
