At least you my word is considered real. Your word fictional.
At least my word was coined by a playwright, its existence not being merely theoretical, since yours is made up by putting "anti" before "dis". Seriously. Mine did exist, and was actually used somewhere, and it did not gain its length by two prepositions meaning the same thing. None of the other words were coined by a playwright, either, I don't consider them valid examples thus.
What your acronym stood for by each individual letter was incoherent; if you read the words going down it dosen't mean anything because they were random. Mine weren't.
Yours weren't? Really?
Time Anyone Burdens Lies In Someones Heart Mercilesly Evermore;
"Time" was supposed to be an alternative to "Sentence", indicated by a "/". I don't count "alternatives to words" as words. And, as a result, I don't think yours have a meaning either, considering one of them doesn't match up. And yeah, anyway, you sit down and write a random word for each letter of that word. Oh, and without the use of a dictionary. Then try my word with words that make sense together.
Stop Crying, Irritating Everyone Not Calling Everyone
Ok if you don't like alternate words, I could simply change "Sentence" to "Single" and remove the /. Would that make you happy?
Always Nicely Tie In Double Inuenndo Stuff Every Single Time Anyone Burdens Lies In Someones Heart Mercilesly Evermore; Not To Allow Rants In A Nonexistant Irksome Smart Mind.
Antidisestablishmentarianism
Here's your word:
Lame Opulent People Always Direct Others ÂTo Evil, Making A Complete Headache Of ÂStuff. Every Little Adolescent Can Help Others Get A Life; Even Older ÂKinds Recieve Assistance. Never Invite Opulence: Largely Egotistical Individuals Practice Scientific Accomplihments; Never Open Discussions Regarding Insolence. Many ÂHave Youthful Perspectives On ÂTact; Reproach Individuals Making Mistakes About True Omnipotence. ÂSome Individuals Like Posting Here In Obvious ÂProtest Against Reproaching Anyone; Others ÂMake Excuses Listing Intentional Tyranny Over ÂKindness. At These Apeasers, Kindness Ends Childish Heckling. You ÂMust, Evermore, Not Omit ÂKindness Into Coherent Hypothoses; Love Effortlessly Permitting Individualls Kindness Over Strength. Strengthen Your Persistance; Honor Overconfident ÂPeople, Heal Ailing Thieves; They Overrun ÂPlaces Effortlessly, Ransacking Important Stuff That Everyone Really ÂAdmires. Love Everyone; Kindness Triumphs Reason. You Overstate Needless ÂOpinions Prior To Ending ÂKindness: Every Person Has A Life: Love Individuality; Open ÂKind Insights; Give Kingly Love; Outright, ÂPerfect Enlightenment Lingers Endlessly In Omnipotence. ÂLet All Grieve Openly In Overbearing ÂSorrow. I Repeat, Always Implore Opposition ÂBefore Attempting Particularly Heinous Events: ÂTyranny Rules Abhorrent Gatherers; Any Nuisance Opposes ÂPoliteness To Erase Repentences You Grieve Over Now.
Um, no? "Double Innuendo Stuff"? Double stuff? Double the stuff, yes, but double stuff? And the use of that "Evermore"? It still doesn't 'make sense', it's just that the words almost have a meaning together, mostly, even if you exclude the alternative. Anyway, I don't want to argue. It's not that I don't admit you've done something that is, to a certain degree, smart, but I won't have anyone write "Beat that n0obs." and go unpunished, in my own way, if that is also directed to me, since its being general. By the way, you actually sat down and did that? And I actually thought I was being far too serious, at times... Although pretty much nobody can do that: "Then try my word with words that make sense together.", apart from Chuck Norris. And yes, by that I meant 'in a text'. Oh, and, even though I have nothing personal against you, I do kind of dislike antidisestablishmenterianism, as a word. Pleonasm is something I sometimes can't stand... like saying "I just had a newborn baby!". Was there any chance you just had a six year-old?
