ForumsThe TavernWhat it Takes to Become a Moderator (page 1):

573 433561
cormyn
offline
cormyn
2,891 posts
Nomad

Hey everyone,

In my time at Armor Games, I've seen a few new moderators come on board, and every time we promote a user to Moderator status, there's always a flurry of "why wasn't I picked?" or "I think _____ should be a Moderator" or "why is ________ still a moderator" or lots of other questions about what it really takes to be a Moderator on the site.

As of this writing, I have three comments on my profile asking for 'exact' requirements for becoming a Moderator.

I know we have information scattered around the site, but I wanted to sum up briefly a few of the core things we look for in a user in order to be nominated to become a Moderator. Hopefully this will help clear up some of the confusion.

This topic is meant to be informational in nature. I will delete any message containing text which is negative towards our current team, comments suggesting some other user be nominated, replies of "well, I guess I'll never qualify" or anything else off-topic -- even if your message contains other good ideas. This is not the place for *those* discussions.

Also, it should be obvious that this list is NOT complete, because we don't want to give away EVERY detail about what we look for in a moderator. And this list is also subject to change over time, especially when AG3 launches.

--------------

BACKGROUND

We are obviously much more strict in our criteria than other sites, but that's only because we already have the best users out there and we want to be sure that anyone being a Moderator can follow our rules, guidelines, and get along with others.


THE PROCESS

In a nutshell, candidates are presented to the entire Moderator team, and are reviewed thoroughly by an Admin. The Moderator team decides unanimously (the exception being users who are on hiatus/holidays) on whether to accept the user or not; a negative response could either be "this user should never be a moderator" (and give reasons why) or "let's check back in 3-6 months". If an affirmative decision is made, an Admin user will Email the user asking if they'll accept the role and responsibilities. If the user accepts, the Admin user will promote them to become a probationary Moderator. We guide probationary Moderators for a little while and then release them into the wild.


HOW WE FIND USERS

There are two ways we find potential nominees.

First and foremost is by daily interactions within the forums or user profile comments. That's not to say that ONLY &quotopular" people will get nominated, but we're not likely to nominate someone that nobody really knows. We've recently passed on a half dozen users because none of us really know them as individuals. We'll start paying more attention to them now, of course.

The second method we use is a piece of software I wrote which takes some of the quantifiable criteria mentioned below and scans our database looking for users who qualify. Generally, this software finds HUNDREDS of users, and then starts disqualifying them based on other factors. Once it reports the users to me, I examine the user profiles, and then present a final list of nominees to the Moderator team. Candidates to whom the Moderator team give a definitive 'no way, never', we add to a 'skip' list so the software won't even look at them next time. There's a second "skip list" for users we want to check back on in a few months.

The last scan I did, which resulted in Freakenstein being added to the team, found almost 400 users, filtered them down to less than a dozen, and we were left with one definite 'yes' (Freakenstein), and a handful of "let's check back later" candidates (who we will not name).


SOME OF THE CRITERIA WE LOOK FOR

To be considered as a Moderator nominee, here are SOME of the things we look for. This list is not complete and is subject to change at any time without notice. We may or may not alter this forum posting to describe new or changed criteria. Also, meeting all of this criteria doesn't guarantee anything, because the rest of the Moderator team still has to vote on accepting you into our small team.

- You obviously need to have an excellent understanding of our Terms and Conditions for being on the site, and know the Rules & Guidelines for both the forums and game/user comments. And you follow them yourself.

- You need to stay up to date on things happening at Armor Games, especially with Armor Games v3 coming out later this summer. Users who have been in the beta since late last year will get extra points.

- You need to have an exceptional grasp of the English language (excellent spelling and grammar) but being fluent in one other language for support purposes may help your chances. You don't need to be an English professor, but 1337-speaking / textmsg writing styles, or writing styles which are difficult to read/understand will disqualify you.

- You need to be able to take criticism, from Admins, other Moderators, and especially other users. And you need to humbly accept this criticism when it's "constructive", or learn when it's "destructive" and deal with it accordingly without losing your cool.

- You need to be at LEAST 18 years of age; if you don't share your birth date on your profile (at least the year and month), you'll never even show up on our radar. And we have backups of our user data, so don't go changing your profile birth date trying to cheat the system -- we'll ask for proof.

- You need to have been an active, consistent member of the site for a minimum of 12-18 months. Big gaps in your login/posting history will generally reset this timer.

- You must be a genuinely helpful person within several forums. We watch where you post, how frequently you post, how many times you've posted in each forum, whether you're posting just to jump in on the conversation or genuinely getting involved in the topic, etc.

- We look for well-rounded users who also have good communication via user comments, but not to an excessive (spammy) degree. As such, users who carry on really long conversations back and forth (technically against our rules) will probably get passed on.

- We look for a minimum participation level from forum posts AND user comments. We need to see that you don't just focus on one type of commenting. Obviously we won't quantify these "minimum" values, because we don't want users trying to cheat the system.

- We look for a minimum number of rated games and game comments, and *recent* game ratings and comments, because we need to know you're actually playing the games and having fun too, not just hanging out in the forums 95% of the time. If you never participate in game comments, how will you recognize bad game comments versus merit-worthy comments?

- You must not have excessive quantities of user/game comments removed as spam. "Excessive" is subjective, but we can see how many comments you've had deleted, and we weigh that as a ratio against your remaining active comments.

- Generally, we tell users that even a single temporary ban will disqualify you. A temp-ban for flaming, spamming, harassment, fighting, racial comments, excessive swearing, or blatant rule breaking like hacking will certainly disqualify you. But if the temp-ban happened a long time ago (more than a year and a half), while we never "expunge" them from your history, we may treat them lighter than if your temp-ban was more recent.


WHAT DO WE EXPECT FROM OUR MODERATORS

New Moderators will start out working on cleaning up game comments and forum posts, and looking for merit-worthy game comments. They'll also continue to be helpful in the forums and via user comments to offer help and support, making sure other users are aware of the rules of the web site (and follow them).

We understand that life throws a curve-ball now and then, and while we certainly don't expect Moderators to be on the site every single day, we do expect that you're on the site several times per week. We also expect Moderators to take a break/holiday from time to time. This isn't a paid job, you're doing it for free, so don't feel guilty if you need to step away for a little while. Excessive absences may get you demoted back to regular user status.

And of course, you can always turn us down if you don't want to be on the team, and you can leave the team at any time as well.

----------------

Hopefully that helps clear up some of the confusion about what kind of users we look for as Moderators.

Let the discussion begin.

  • 573 Replies
GhostOfMatrix
offline
GhostOfMatrix
15,595 posts
Herald

If possible, I would like to see if I meet the requirements for being a moderator.

I suggest reading the opening post, it covers what they look for.
ask08
offline
ask08
51 posts
Nomad

Okay, thank you very much! I just wanted to see if they would want to further discuss it or anything :-). Thank you though for your very helpful help!
fartmaster1001
offline
fartmaster1001
2 posts
Nomad

Enjoy playing TLS DZ. Helping other DZ players survive the DZ. To help make AG a better place. To keep it safe from rude/abusive comments. To remove offense comment's & writers. To help make AG a friendly all ages gaming site.
Thank you for your time.

MrDayCee
offline
MrDayCee
14,745 posts
King

Being a Moderator is not only about TLSZ you know... it covers the entire website. =)

bar10022
offline
bar10022
13 posts
Peasant

@cormon even if dont want to be a moderator, can we at least help with issues in the forms like cussing,verbal abuse of any kind or, hating on games,or any things of that nature?

bar10022
offline
bar10022
13 posts
Peasant

wrong cormin i @cormyn sry

Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

There is nothing wrong with just helping out around the site by reporting/flagging bad behavior.

Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

Couldn't help but notice that one of the points was "-You need to stay up to date on things happening at Armor Games, especially with Armor Games v3 coming out later this summer. Users who have been in the beta since late last year will get extra points."


This thread was created two and a half years ago, when things were run entirely differently and AG had other plans for its future. The fact that it hasn't been stickied for ages suggests that more than a few things in the OP may be a bit outdated.
mightybob
offline
mightybob
360 posts
Peasant

Don't mean this is a bad way but it seems only mods and admins have their knight/king old ranks back? Any chance everyone will get these old ranks back eventually?

brp47
offline
brp47
580 posts
Peasant

Didn't this thread used to be a sticky?

Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

Didn't this thread used to be a sticky?


It did, up until sometime in 2013. But parts of the opening post are fairly outdated--I'm not sure if cormyn's moderator-o-matic software is still in use, and the plans for AGv3 were abandoned and changed to a series of small AG2 updates--so the thread was taken down at some point within the past year or so.

Why people still feel the need to post here is beyond me.
pft
offline
pft
574 posts
Grand Duke

Why people still feel the need to post here is beyond me.


If there is an updated version of the thread then all would be sorted. It is probably unlikely for another to be made.

People can poke at the Admins to make another, if they aren't busy,
devansh_asthana
offline
devansh_asthana
480 posts
Farmer

Mods have blue and a blue knight badge.

You are right,they are champions knights supreme.

brp47
offline
brp47
580 posts
Peasant

It did, up until sometime in 2013. But parts of the opening post are fairly outdated--I'm not sure if cormyn's moderator-o-matic software is still in use, and the plans for AGv3 were abandoned and changed to a series of small AG2 updates--so the thread was taken down at some point within the past year or so.

Why people still feel the need to post here is beyond me.


Just shows how long some users like you and I have been here XD
devansh_asthana
offline
devansh_asthana
480 posts
Farmer

Just shows how long some users like you and I have been here XD

It is not about longness,it is about helping people.

Showing 526-540 of 573