Forums → WEPR → would you save the earthquake in japan or stop world hunger?

There's nothing to stop another quake that may be even more powerful, so I doubt it would do anything if the one quake was prevented. There's one downside to ending world hunger: the food they'll get will be lower-grade than Taco Bell beef. If there was a way to guarantee that they'd be eating healthy, then I'd choose to end world hunger. Sadly there's too much greed for that to happen any time soon.

Both are impossible, but this is like asking "do you want to make the whole world better or just restore one part of it to it's original state?"

Since when is Japan not part of the world?

well i would stop world hunger if it would last forever but i would make sure that people still work.

wasn't this topic dead because evry1 agrees that world hunger is the worst?

I would TOTALLY stop the world hunger.

The earthquake happened and was survived within a month.

The world hunger affects MILLIONS of peoples.

Anyone would chose the second option.

I would TOTALLY stop the world hunger.

The earthquake happened and was survived within a month.

The world hunger affects MILLIONS of peoples.

Anyone would chose the second option.

I would end world hunger. Starvation has claimed more lives through human history than all natural disasters combined.

Deffinatly stop world hunger. It's killed more people in Africa alone than all earthquakes combined.
Also, ending world hunger would fix part of the problem Japan is having now.

oops didn't see the above post. But yes I most certainly agree with you MagicLobster.

I would definatly stop world hunger. it would save a lot more lives plus it would stop a lot of the deaths from the earthquake because of lack of food due to the earthquake

Stop world hunger retroactively, that way more people would survive, therefore increasing the odds that one or more of them would become the person/people who figure out how to stop or control earthquakes.

Stupid question. Of course everybody is going to stop world hunger. It takes more lives than that one EQ, and is a much bigger problem. Furthermore, if we all had the resources to survive, we'd all be able to better fulfill our potential, and I'm sure our world would be much more developed.

I'd stop world hunger

End world hunger. The interests of the many outweigh that of Japan.

Earthquake in Japan here. But in real life world hunger. Just want to create some diversity.