Forums → Popular Media → the real rugrats story

don't care for the rugrats, I've watched the show now that I'm older and I think that those are horrible parents because they never keep up with their kids and take advice from a book while the kids are running off. Those kids should be supervised and taken from those parents on the show.

It's about how Angelica makes up all the babies in her head.It is a real story too.

The realy story? What is up with this, I like the origonal.

There are no sources whatsoever to prove this. Alas, it is but a very good story. Sure, if you don't know a lot about rugrats it's plausible. & maybe there is a hidden agenda, as there is with most tv shows, but nowhere near to the extent described.

If everyone died in Angelicas life and it was such a tragic story, why was it made as a kids tv show and not as a movie or documentary? Not to mention "Suzie" isn't a creator - so that's just a straight up lie.

Emporer is sort of right - the series wasn't supposed to nclude Angelica: it was based on the lives of four children - tommy, chuckie, phil and lil. The concept was to show babies perspective on the world ad how their adventures work.

Angelica wasn't bipolar, she was a typical manipulative kid who wanted her way 24/7.

I'll admit that story is creative, but it's just too 'out there' and unbacked. There are many stories/shows that would be easily explained as a big drug trip. To explain Looney Tunes, it could be said that Elmer Fudd was riddiculed for his speech impediment and decided to take cocaine. He was high when he went hunting and thought the animals were talking. This is equally unbacked, yet it explains some things.

^ I don't even want to begin creatin stories for half of the shows.
Little monsters? >.> Let alone them being on a trip, sometimes you'd swear you were.

Anybody can create a conspiracy theory out of a manifestation of a mental illness. I'm not that impressed. You should hear some of the stuff the psychiatric patients come up with when they turn up at hospital.

Where did this story originate? Some messed up stuff.

Glad I was never that into the Rugrats.

Since some of you can't tell this is made up, here's what wiki has on the origins of the show.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rugrats#Origins

And for those of you disturbed by this story. LOL

I don't think its real, I just think someone got really high one day and decided to put a ****ed up backstory to the Rugrats. Whoever they were they did a **** good job too.

If you think that this is bad, you should also read "Squidward's Suicide". I can't watch Spongebob anymore. It's been a while since I've watched Rugrats, but still, that's pretty messed up.

A story like this would work really well for Phineas and Ferb.

I don't really know what to believe, the messed up version that ruined my thought of Rugrats or the wikipedia link from GrayWolf that sounds better in my opinion. Sadly, my view was shaken up a bit. I use to love Rugrats and even after reading both sides of the topic I still sort of do. I mean you can't believe everything on the web so just because something on Yahoo Answers seems plausible won't change my view of one of my fav childhood shows easily. Sure it can shake me up a bit but if it can't be fully proven then it is amidst a lie as Jeffreysinspiration stated thoroughly. I'm not saying a similar thing cannot happen but it just doesn't seem right for a cheerful children's TV show featuring adventurous babies as the main characters. Do you thing Nickelodeon would create a show based on a backstory from the imagination of a bipolar drug addict? I'd go with GrayWolf's link as the true story.

well... for something like this to have any merit, wouldn't the parents of any given child from the series have to not interact with their children when Angelica wasn't around? ...Or is everything with her not in it just a dream or a day dream by her of kids without her in the picture? I mean (when I remember them) my dreams always incorporate myself as a part of them. ...I'm not going to go look up episodes (mostly b/c of my internet.), but I think I remember the parents interacting with their children when Angelica wasn't there.

wouldn't the parents of any given child from the series have to not interact with their children when Angelica wasn't around?