ForumsWEPRVigilantism - Bad or Good?

22 10409
TheAtheist
offline
TheAtheist
132 posts
Peasant

There has been a rise in vigilantes in Mexico, the UK, and the Philippines. I've also heard rumors of a rising in the US. Maybe criminals are becoming less afraid of law enforcement? And maybe that's why there is a rise. Anyhow, Is it a good or thing? Even though they're breaking the law.

  • 22 Replies
TheAtheist
offline
TheAtheist
132 posts
Peasant

Anyhow, Is it a good or thing?


Oops I meant is it a good or bad thing?
sprooschicken
offline
sprooschicken
1,143 posts
Nomad

Well in the UK a lot of rag tag vigilante groups (the Enfield army) have banded together to protect their neighborhoods from rioters, they're only temporary though

ClockworkAmelia
offline
ClockworkAmelia
54 posts
Farmer

You know, it may be that the rise of the superhero movie genre is actually having an influence. Likely not entirely on its own, of course. We--or the US, at least--have been in an era of complacency. Maybe vigilantism is the beginning of a rebellion in attitudes. We see that our government has come to a legislative standstill and are taking things into our own hands.

314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

As many things, it depends on the circumstance. I would say that in the UK, US, and most powerful countries as such, the law is evolved enough to the point where it can pretty much punish people as needed. Vigilantism doesn't count self defense, so its really unnecessary and actually a rather bad thing to do if your, say, punishing some guy accused of child molestation without trial, or who wasn't punished in the trial.

I could see vigilantism being a decent thing if you are in some unnamed hell where violence happens on your doorstep daily, doubly so if the police forces have abandoned you and pretty much left you to die. Basically you would be forced to form your own mini-govornment, preferably with a trial system, as a kind of militia to keep you from getting shot. Of course this is hypothetical.

loco5
offline
loco5
16,287 posts
Peasant

preferably with a trial system


humans don't work that way, i don't remember seeing ancient cave drawings of a man in a powdered wig


maybe in places where the police are too scared or too corrupt or too non existent to help the general populace
314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

humans don't work that way, i don't remember seeing ancient cave drawings of a man in a powdered wig


But I assume you do remember this, which came a little while after it?

http://www.louvre.fr/media/repository/ressources/sources/illustration/autres/x196image_50160_v2_m56577569831196385.jpg

But since that picture if to vague to make a point, it is of the code of Hammurabi. 1700 BC, and it already had a basic form of laws, with a basic court system. So yeah, there is that which suggests this is in fact, human nature.
loco5
offline
loco5
16,287 posts
Peasant

basic court system



ah yes the pissed off crowed confronting a murderer is gonna set up a trial, obviously and those metal pipes, they're just for if he get out of hand
ClockworkAmelia
offline
ClockworkAmelia
54 posts
Farmer

Hey, he didn't say it had to be GOOD system.

314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

ah yes the pissed off crowed confronting a murderer is gonna set up a trial, obviously and those metal pipes, they're just for if he get out of hand


Well if you can see he is honestly a serial murderer, and you don't have any aid from government officials or any of the things we mentioned, what other choice do they have then to execute him? Its not like they could just throw him in one of their closets for the rest of eternity, and since we already established the government has left you, you can't put him in a prison. What I meant is they should at least take some basic steps to know they have the correct guy.

And we are talking about a horrible your government is dead kind of thing, not random lynch mobs in the middle of the U.S killing people because they where considered innocent in the trail and the people didn't like the outcome. When they really have no other choice between getting shot by mob members or killing the "criminals".
loco5
offline
loco5
16,287 posts
Peasant

Hey, he didn't say it had to be GOOD system.


good point


Well if you can see he is honestly a serial murderer, and you don't have any aid from government officials or any of the things we mentioned, what other choice do they have then to execute him? Its not like they could just throw him in one of their closets for the rest of eternity, and since we already established the government has left you, you can't put him in a prison. What I meant is they should at least take some basic steps to know they have the correct guy.

i concede, carry on
Sarthra21
offline
Sarthra21
1,078 posts
Nomad

I don't think Vigilantes are that bad. They're willing to do what the law is not. Basically if I was a vigilante my philosophy would be, "I'd prefer to take you in alive, but if you want to die, that's fine too."
I'd like everyone to watch Law Abiding Citizen so they can see what's wrong with our court system.

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

Well, when people are just angry and start shooting/killing people only to get revenge, then it's wrong. When they're fighting to defend others, then it's more ok.

R3LOAD
offline
R3LOAD
531 posts
Peasant

Well, when you've got people as epic as Knight Warrior using his ultimate abilities of picking up broken glass with his bare hands, picking up knocked over bins, and telling the police about drug deals and fights, how's it not a good thing? Especially when he's defending the streets of Salford from really evil super villains such as Lord Dark and The Precinct Predator.

Seroph
offline
Seroph
54 posts
Scribe

The problem with vigilantism is that right and wrong is interpreted by one person. By "doing what the law will not", a vigilante is using their own judgment to decide what the law should be doing, then imposing their judgments forcibly on those around them.

It's easy to say that it can be good or bad, but such ambiguity is at the heart of why vigilantism is illegal. Why should one person who appoints oneself have the authority to decide what is best for a community?

One could argue that all the acts of terrorism are vigilantism. For example, the Norway terrorist attack on the camp was carried out because a group of radicals believed they were doing what was best for their country even though the majority of the world strongly disagreed. They believed the law should take action to prevent immigration, so they took it into their own hands instead of letting appointed officials decide what should be done.

Joe96
offline
Joe96
2,226 posts
Peasant

Things are crazy today. Governments are corrupt and scrambling to find money. Vigilantes often tend to do their own thing as they sometimes take matters into their own hands and that can cause chaos if they have a motive and a catchy slogan.

Showing 1-15 of 22