Here I have a good question for you. Let's say their is this man who commited a murder(s) and he is POSSIBLY bloodthirsty crazy. Would you prefer him to be life in jail OR killed at the spot?
My answer would be killed at the spot. Too many times have criminals who people THINK they have changed which they do not, go on parol or get bailed out by their lawyers. Anyone else got an answer?
After a fair trial (of course), I think that it would be better for lethal injection. Some people are just too dangerous to be kept alive and they can even commit crime in jail (especially if they're bloodthirsty lol) and keeping people in jail for a life sentence would waste money, resources, and available space for inmates convicted for less serious crimes (overcrowding is an issue in some prisons).
padded cell, rubber ducky, and a straight jacket to keep him uncomfy.
Aw you stole my answer! And I swear that's how I would've said it too! Well I guess I'd say give him a few years and if he can prove he's changed then good but if he kills another then give him torture then kill.
I would put he/she for life sentence. It can even cost less then death and death doesn't do anything but get revenge. The point here is to keep innocent people safe.
He must be sent to prison with maximum security, where the same criminals are spending the rest of their lives. If you just shoot him - you'll feel relieved for a while, till another one with more crazy thoughts in his head and bigger thurst of blood appear, cuz he wants to revenge society that killed his idol. In prison other criminals will teach him a liitle lesson of life, and he will have to study it every day till the end of his life.
After a fair trial, he/she has to be sent to prison (one with a high security level) for life sentence. I don't understand death penalty. What's the difference between the murder and the one who kills him/her? I know these two situations are not the same, but the line is too thin for me.
