Forums → Popular Media → Deadlest Warrior Biased?

Personally, I dunno XD

Its very hard to find anything entirely unbiased imo

the pre-gunpowder episodes are better anyway. i never check those whit guns.

They aren't biased. They are usually right before hand.

With SWAT vs. GSG9, it came down to training. If that episode was in the new season, that would've been factored in. But what other episodes have the Americans won when they should've lost?

But since the new season I've pretty much decided to stop watching it because of those two new guys. Baldy makes everything sound like a history lesson and everything he says sounds more scripted than the rest of them. The other guy at the computer just sits there all day rather than going to the weapons testing.

The GSG9 had more factors, like the chicken training thing, and instead of using the frag grenade that they DID use, they used a stun one. :P

The show isn't biased because they had the green berets go against the spetsnaz and the spetznaz won

It's the way they do it, as if the cia only used 4 different types of weapons. piff

and etc with the people in the new millennial (guns n stuff)

or with 'joan of arc' vs 'duke of blahwhatshisface'

that just made me facepalm, pure speculation that one.

I liked Greek solider vs mongols

and ones like that

The show isn't biased because they had the green berets go against the spetsnaz and the spetznaz won

You should read my whole thread. Some say it's just a coverup for the other American wins.

THe most predominant case of this is Lawrence of Arabia vs. Roosevelt.

Most of the battle was fine by me, but when it came down to the knife fight between the two, how did the fat, tobacco-ridden American beat a man who could run a sub- 5 minute mile?

K then, the results are in. Deadliest Warrior is biased when it comes to Americans. Case dismissed.

Most of the battle was fine by me, but when it came down to the knife fight between the two, how did the fat, tobacco-ridden American beat a man who could run a sub- 5 minute mile?

I think it could be, mostly because they are using a program that has to run off numbers, and you can't really give an exact number to all the factors, so they have to add some biased.