Also, the administrators probably have to go through at least 10-20 games a week, and they have to test it and see if it's worth putting on the site. Would you like having 1 or 2 new games every day, knowing they might not be that good or waiting 4-5 days for one good game?
It's not a good game OR a few crappy games, it would be a good game AND a few crappy games.
Up to the AG if they want to clutter the site or not with the crappy games IN ADDITION to the good games; just couldn't help point out the logic failures of these posters.
would be a great idea if they tought us how to make games. So we can make games for the site !!
you do know to make games for the quality of this site will cost money and are kinda hard to do
AG is a free online gaming site - not an online course.
Loco is right, to get to the standard of games on this site would be difficult, but you can always check out Programming Help for some help if you're considering learning.
I think it is much better to wait longer for better, more playable games then just see every day a lot of crap games that You regret You ever seen... I really don't like to rate games really low. I always remember that somebody put some work and effort so I can play it but some of this games are really not good enough to be placed on AG. I think it's much better like it is now.
I remember when it seemed like there were new games every day, idk if I was just young and didn't realise how fast time actually was flying by, or if I am remembering a very high, quality/submission fit that had come to an end.
perhaps all of the guys that contributed to that fit found more important things to do, or maybe we just got lucky for a few months.
But it is usually worth the wait. like for Sonny 3.....even though he said he wanted to work on like 2 other projects first.....but its cool.
If you think there should be more games then submit them yourself. Until then you need to calm down and be patient. The game makers are working as fast as they can.
