Forums → News and Feedback → Has anybody noticed...

That's actually where the achievement idea came from. We are similar to Kongregate, but not the same. We just got some ideas from other sites.

eddyalex thank you for repeading what acmed just said, anyways no it is not that much like kongregate our community is way better.

I don't think ideas mentioned can be totally linked to kong, the final release isn't out yet so we won;t know until then.

well if your just talking about achievements, a lot of sites have those, or medals/badges. Newgrounds has a medal system, along with addicting games as far as i know (of course that could be for certain games).

Well, achievements are everywhere, Kongregate didn't event them. And about the layout and everything, I don't see the similarities.

Sorry, I mean Kongregate didn't invent them.

@Yodadude53:

AG:


Kong:


AG:


Kong:


AG:


Kong:


I don't think I'm the only one that sees the similarities.

@GhostOfMatrix: I don't see the similarities in the first pair of images, but the other pairs are very similar.

Ah, okay. Well I can see similarities now. I think Armor Games looks a little cleaner.

uhm, i see them but some what, i see a AWESOME AG website and the "did you make that site in html 3.2?( we at html 5 now)" kong,

but geuss what, kong suports AG, so there is little compition, also for a lot of AG game you have to be on AG to use features(highscore,sign,multi severs,ect.). also did every one read the words saying BETA? not to be rude but so times i don't think people understand BETA.

also AG is internal better by a lot! it is faster, sleecker, and more powerfull.

basicly AG is BETTER than kong no matter what!

uhm, i see them but some what, i see a AWESOME AG website and the "did you make that site in html 3.2?( we at html 5 now)" kong,

but geuss what, kong suports AG, so there is little compition, also for a lot of AG game you have to be on AG to use features(highscore,sign,multi severs,ect.). also did every one read the words saying BETA? not to be rude but so times i don't think people understand BETA.

also AG is internal better by a lot! it is faster, sleecker, and more powerfull.

basicly AG is BETTER than kong no matter what!

uhm, i see them but some what, i see a AWESOME AG website and the "did you make that site in html 3.2?( we at html 5 now)" kong,

but geuss what, kong suports AG, so there is little compition, also for a lot of AG game you have to be on AG to use features(highscore,sign,multi severs,ect.). also did every one read the words saying BETA? not to be rude but so times i don't think people understand BETA.

also AG is internal better by a lot! it is faster, sleecker, and more powerfull.

basicly AG is BETTER than kong no matter what!

People fail to realize that it's in the first phase of beta, and they have many more months to improve and change, so I don't necessarily understand why people arguing about this. If you don't like it, leave some constructive criticism about it and tell them how they can improve and change the design. That's part of the reason it's still in beta, anyway, for them to get opinions about it from the users, and to test things. Simply saying "it sucks because Kong had it first!" isn't going to change anything.

Please. You think that just because it's a beta, they're going to completely redesign it (again) before release? That's not what a beta is for. Beta means they've locked in the basic design. Betas are for bug squashing, or small issues with the layout to be ironed out... No, if their design is ripping off Kongregate now, it'll rip off Kongregate all the way through release.

Yes, because they aren't going to take what we have to say into consideration and because the design in closed beta wasn't different at all~