I don't know anyone who is satisfied with only singleplayer these days
I am. In fact, many multiplayer games suck. They are full of people who just mess up the game, lag, hack, cheat, glitch, and are just overall annoying. Not to mention it's boring to play something where the only point is to run around and kill others for 10 minutes and then see who did that the most (Cod) more than a few times.
If my knowledge of the English language is any good, I'm pretty sure you're wrong. Epic is used to describe something that is more than excellent. You can call a play that was an hour long epic.
Epic is actually used to describe a very long story or event. An epic adventure = long adventure. In slang though it means awesome.
Man take Modern Warfare 3!!!!!!! Its the best FPS ever
Luls. No...I don't think so. Just about every FPS is a better FPS, all Cod has worked out is the multiplayer, which has been the same for who knows how long. Each game they just change up the perks, the kill bonus, guns, attachments, and acheivements, re-number it, and sell it off again. Not that it's not a good game, it's just highly overrated.
Skyrim. a lot of my friends love it. and a lot of my friends say mw3 is just like mw2. i haven't played either so i'm just going off my friend's opinions.
That's...kind of a strange question...not to say stupi...hmm. Both styles are so drastically different, there has to be one you prefer; Rpg/adventure or shooter: that should be the real dilemma.
To be honest you will probably get much more game time out of CoD. Sure Skyrim has a ton of game time but it does eventually end, but with CoD you will constantly be playing new games with friends. On that note CoD is a much more social game, and i find that i have more fun when i'm playing games with friends.
