ForumsWEPRSYRIAS war

12 3465
bigmac258
offline
bigmac258
103 posts
Nomad

Do you belive the goverment when they say terriost started the war?

  • 12 Replies
nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

I've only ever got access to Western friendly/slanted media, and Syrian statements are claimed by them to be completely unfounded, so how would my sceptic mind satisfy itself?

thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

According to aljazeera, bashar al asad had killed many people by now.
I read a report in a newspaper that protesters are tortured brutally.

TheGodZlo
offline
TheGodZlo
106 posts
Shepherd

I don't think that terrorists started the war.

goumas13
offline
goumas13
4,752 posts
Grand Duke

I guess you can say that the Syrian civil war was started by terrorists. Simply because both the Syrian government and the opposition can fall under the term "terrorists".

jroyster22
offline
jroyster22
755 posts
Peasant

Technically, terrorists did start this war however you look at it.

macfan1
offline
macfan1
421 posts
Nomad

According to aljazeera


Dude, you watch that? The people's accents are terrible.

I think there should be US troops in Syria, actively participating.
deathbewithyou
offline
deathbewithyou
534 posts
Nomad

Technically, terrorists did start this war however you look at it.

I thought this had to do with how their government was treating them.
partydevil
offline
partydevil
5,129 posts
Jester

Dude, you watch that? The people's accents are terrible.


not every1 here comes from the usa.
aljazeera has millions of viewers.
and no they are not all terrorists as you are probably thinking.
Joe96
offline
Joe96
2,226 posts
Nomad

From what I have heard, the military is starving and firing mortar rounds onto innocent civilians. It is terrible what these poor people are enduring right now and I will be sure to keep them in my thoughts and prayers.

I think there should be US troops in Syria, actively participating

But the U.S. government has close ties to Syria and to get involved would not be good. It would really mess things up and the Syrian government has already threatened the U.S. government against this. If we get involved, we may very well be fighting in 3 wars (4 if you consider the Korean War as we never signed a peace treaty and still have thousands of troops at the 38th parallel). Also, when Americans got involved in Somalia, the people were starving and banded into gangs which would fight over the food drops and eventually brutally murdered 19 American soldiers. However, when we didn't get involved in the Rwandan genocide, almost half a million people were killed in a matter of less than 2 years. I believe that to stop this, people must learn of this injustice and actively condemn the actions of the Syrian government and boycott Syrian products (whatever they sell) as well as nations setting tariffs on their exports.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

Dude, you watch that? The people's accents are terrible.

I think there should be US troops in Syria, actively participating.

They should not be there unless called there by majority.
You are not world police.
Let them resolve their differences.
jroyster22
offline
jroyster22
755 posts
Peasant

I agree with the Punisher on this one.

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

I think there should be US troops in Syria, actively participating.

Really? Another intervention? Iraq just ended, Afghanistan's mad. A new battle against Assad's 400000+ troops won't do us any good.
Showing 1-12 of 12