
We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing
analytics and serving ads.
Learn More
1147 | 373539 |
I think homosexuality is totally wrong and unnatural, what do you think?
You know, I never really cared about people being homosexual. Even now I don't care in the least, but the hypocritical bigotry I have seen from this person has persuaded me to support their cause nonetheless.
I am not sure how what others do in any manner that has no effect on your life, Can make someone dislike something? Does anyone being gay somehow make your life at threat? Is the life you have that bad that your only purpose is to hate something? Is all this based on religious teachings?
Lack of knowledge is the biggest cause of hating something.
but of course in your mentality everyone has to support gays and if they don't they will have to be either warned, muted or banned.
What is "sex"? What is it's purpose, what's it for, how does it work, why does it even exist?
What is "love? Is love sex? Is love part of sex, or is sex part of love? Does love need sex? Can two people love one another with sex? Can two people have sex together without love? What is first, or prior, or more important? Which should lead the way in relationships? Which should be the master, and which should be subservient - between sex and love?
What is "Nature" and is the most natural way necessarily the best way in all things?
What is "choice"? How do you know when you have a choice and when you don't?
Lack of knowledge is the biggest cause of hating something.
What is "sex"? What is it's purpose, what's it for, how does it work, why does it even exist?
I hope you're reading it, because otherwise there is no point of this argument still going, this topic wasn't only made for the gay-loving people, but of course in your mentality everyone has to support gays and if they don't they will have to be either warned, muted or banned.
Fiend..a tip: what can be argued without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
In the same way pedophilia is a mental disorder.
Pedophilia is very easy to understand -
When you are 8 years old, 8 years old girls/boys are attractive to you. When you are 16, 16 virls/boys are attractive for you. When you are 40, 16 years old girls/boys are attractive for you. The rest is a lie.
Straight mans love young womens. Thats it.
With pedophile, what they find as preety is a little bit taboo. They find younger age as attractive. Thats it.
I cant tell you "dont like boobs", can I?I cant make you stop getting attractedto, lets say, blonde hair. Or big buts, which about i cannot lie. Its a fact i cant denay.
Sure i dont think its ok for a mature man to be in a realationship with a kid, but you got to understand them.
They are not monsters. Only sexualy frustrated peoples.
[quote]In the same way pedophilia is a mental disorder.
You can say the same on necrophilia. There are things that our society cant handle. It dosent mean that the peoples who do it are monsters or mentaly ill. Its exactly the same. Only Homosexuals can be attracted by mature peoples.
We cant compare them because the less intelectual peoples will get it wrong. Like putin claim Homos are the cause of pedophilia and so on.
Did you seriously defend pedophilia and necrophilia... in a thread about homosexuality?
They are not monsters. Only sexualy frustrated peoples.
Pazxx - yes i did.
I dont say these acts shoulde be allowed, but i do want you to understand these peoples. Its not their choise as well. The diffrunce is that their parthner is not quite able to be legaly active in sexual activity.
Someone asked: "Why does sex even exist?"
For reproduction, it is a simple scientific fact. It can be used in other ways, but it exists to make little babies.
Someone asked: "Why does sex even exist?"
For reproduction, it is a simple scientific fact. It can be used in other ways, but it exists to make little babies.
For reproduction, it is a simple scientific fact. It can be used in other ways, but it exists to make little babies.
So, you're answering a rhetorical question posted nearly three weeks ago that, despite being rhetorical, has already been answered...twice? Why?
Thread is locked!
We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing
analytics and serving ads.
Learn More