Forums

ForumsWorld Events, Politics, Religion, Etc.

is abortion ok?

Posted May 11, '14 at 1:45am

pangtongshu

pangtongshu

9,891 posts

Um..tf? Why was I singled out, pray tell

 

Posted May 11, '14 at 2:16am

SportShark

SportShark

1,102 posts

What has that ratio (which I consider a very poor estimate) to do with this? Morality is not defined by whatever happens to be the majority of cases.

Then let's just say that in the rare case of a rape pregnancy that the fetus shouldn't have to suffer because of the rapist. I say that we should instate ancient Rome's penalty for rape to make rapists think twice.

Um..tf? Why was I singled out, pray tell

I wasn't referring to you If you're referring to my last post.
 

Posted May 11, '14 at 2:41am

pangtongshu

pangtongshu

9,891 posts

mm..can't edit on mobile.

So here is why I'm confused. My reasoning was singled out against Moe's..yet moe and I are discussing different Different topics. Moe is discussing contraceptives while I was discussing bodily rights.
So..how Were we paired like so?
1) did I miss something? And if so please thoroughly explain for me so I may understand
2) did you perchance miss something?
Or 3) This is a part of this recent obsessive posting on my behalf that has already had moderator interactions on.

Methinks it is the third..hopefully I'm wrong.

 

Posted May 11, '14 at 2:47am

pangtongshu

pangtongshu

9,891 posts

"I like your reasoning 100 times better than Pang's"

Explicitly referring to me. But I'm done discussing this in this thread..swayying far off topic

 

Posted May 11, '14 at 3:18am

SportShark

SportShark

1,102 posts

The world doesn't revolve around you and I've already given you plenty of my time which seems to have been a waste; you aren't getting anywhere but rather continually asking me: why?, why is that?, why was I singled out?, why don't you give more facts to support yourself? why?, why?, why?
All you're doing is waiting for me to say something that you can shoot down as illogical and that you can your fallacy template on top of. Logic is not absolute, it is subjective and easily applied improperly, much like a star-head screw diver trying to screw in a flat head screw.

"Explicitly referring to me. But I'm done discussing this in this thread..swayying far off topic"
Sorry, guess I forgot about that. It is of no importance though.


last edited May 11 2014 03:20 am by SportShark
 

Posted May 11, '14 at 4:09am

Kasic

Kasic

5,750 posts

Unjustified yet tragic, rape abortions account for less than an estimated 1% of all abortions. The rest are because someone (lets not point fingers) was irresponsible.

Do you believe women who have been raped and become pregnant because of that should have the option of whether or not they want to have an abortion?


last edited May 11 2014 04:10 am by Kasic
 

Posted May 11, '14 at 4:19am

pangtongshu

pangtongshu

9,891 posts

I'm tired. I just got off work, and I'm done with this incessant ****.

The world doesn't revolve around you and I've already given you plenty of my time


Nor did I ever ****ing imply so.
Page 85 of this thread You said (and I quote) "That sounds great, Moe! I like your reasoning 100 times better than pang's."
Now, why do I find issue with this? Not because you singled me out, but because you did so -completely unnecessarily-. Moe and I were making points about completely separate topics on abortion so the only thing I can think of for why you would mention me is to continue this parade of "pang posts" that I have been seeing everywhere for the past week or so (did I see I have been seeing? I meant a few users and myself).
But. I gave you the benefit of the doubt, of course, and asked if maybe I missed something..or hell asked if maybe you might have missed something.

Logic [...] is subjective


Jesus...did you honestly just say that?

Logic is subjective and the moon is nothing more than cardboard and fairy dust.

Now, to be as fair as I can be with what little patience I'm still holding on to, did I miss something in your seemingly unnecessary mentioning of me, or are you continuing your inane mudslinging?

[Apologies to the mods. Rough work night. Feel free to delete or whatever]
 

Posted May 11, '14 at 4:25am

Minotaur55

Minotaur55

1,326 posts

Knight

This is just an off topic comment (and sorry about that) but the post above is the result of users having personal qualms and vendettas with one another and expressing frustration from these qualms on the forums. Keep this to a minimum folks. You've already been warned once about this, masta.


last edited May 11 2014 04:29 am by Minotaur55
 

Posted May 11, '14 at 4:27am

Salvidian

Salvidian

4,299 posts

Logic is subjective


You've just nullified every single attempt at an argument. Wow.
 

Posted May 11, '14 at 4:34am

HahiHa

HahiHa

5,440 posts

Knight

That sounds great, Moe! I like your reasoning 100 times better than pang's.

You realize that Moe said there are better arguments against potentiality than the contraceptive one; not that there are none.

Logic is not absolute, it is subjective and easily applied improperly, much like a star-head screw diver trying to screw in a flat head screw.

Logic is absolute and not subjective. The application of logic can be done improperly and subjectively, but this results in a logical fallacy in the argument.

Then let's just say that in the rare case of a rape pregnancy that the fetus shouldn't have to suffer because of the rapist.

Why the foetus? This argument is technically not wrong, but in the grand picture, irrelevant. I say the woman shouldn't have to suffer any more because of the rapist. The woman is the victim, and then you go on and enforce a pregnancy on her? This is plain sadistic.

I say that we should instate ancient Rome's penalty for rape to make rapists think twice.

The penalty for rape has nothing to do with abortion, though.
 
Reply to is abortion ok?

You must be logged in to post a reply!