Forums → Games → Age of war vs. Warlords

i perfer AOW. it has way more replayability, and if a sequel comes out (it better!) then it could be even more awesome...er. if warlords has a sequel, all it could have is more races.

AOW 2 could have more troops, more ages (roman, mesopatamian(after stone, before medivial)an only slightly futuristic time, something WWII or civil war time, many options) more turrets, and more styles of game play. why not have a mode where you are stuck in a certain age? or first to ______ age wins? a mode where you can't use ceratin troops?one where you can ONLY use the most expensive troop, but are constantly gaining small amounts of money? all sound like good ideas to me.

so in conclusion

Age of War > Warlords

Age of War 2 > Warlords 2

and quite possibly Age of war > Warlords 2

I like Warlords more, but Age of War is still awesome, I think that a second Warlords would be better than a second Age of War

age of war better

age of war

I like Age of War. It's simple to understand and really fun.

age of war is fun though warlords has a lot more playtime. id have to go with age of war though.

defiantly warlords!!!!! it was much more fun!!!!!

age of wars...warlords gets realy hard after awhile

well, they are both very fun, warlords took more time, but age of war was REALLY fun. Can't say.

Warlord sucks and age of war rocks!!
Also I like the music in there.

age of war is easier to beat so thats basiclly my reason on why its better...

age of war

Seriously, cut out bumping threads.
But in my opinion, Age of War is a lot simpler and thus, more fun.

I pick Warlords.