|
Posted Oct 23, '12 at 7:36am
Blackbeltr0
249 posts
|
Yeah because one's religious views should be the most important thing to be honest about when planning to take office in what is suppose to be a secular government.
NO BUT IF OBAMA IS A LYER I DO NOT WANT HIM RUNNING MY COUNTRY
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 23, '12 at 9:29am
Kasic
5,155 posts
|
NO BUT IF OBAMA IS A LYER I DO NOT WANT HIM RUNNING MY COUNTRY
He's no more a liar than any other politician out there, Romney included. Which is to say, they skew their presentations and occasionally have to do something that contradicts somewhat with what they said earlier.
Whereas Romney is like a flag flapping in the wind, following political whim one direction to and fro.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 23, '12 at 11:27am
HahiHa
4,223 posts
|
Whereas Romney is like a flag flapping in the wind, following political whim one direction to and fro.
Newest example: the third debate. I heard he tried to play the pacifist, to get the votes of the undecided political centre voters. Meh... Obama dominated this one nonetheless.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 23, '12 at 5:47pm
Blackbeltr0
249 posts
|
Romney. He actually has a chance at turning this country around
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 23, '12 at 6:29pm
Kasic
5,155 posts
|
Romney. He actually has a chance at turning this country around
And around and around and around and around. Ride the merry go round!
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 23, '12 at 7:01pm
EmperorPalpatine
4,090 posts
|
He's no more a liar than any other politician out there
Yeah, I can't think of any honest ones.
*cough* Daniel Inuoye *cough* Ron Paul *cough*
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 23, '12 at 7:32pm
Moe
1,774 posts
|
Romney. He actually has a chance at turning this country around
Right back into the same policies that got us here in the first place. Not very helpful.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 23, '12 at 9:24pm
NoNameC68
4,976 posts
Moderator
|
Honestly, they'll both do the same thing in slightly different ways. They'll both hand out butt loads of money to businesses, the only difference being which businesses. They'll both keep military troops deployed in areas they shouldn't be, the difference being how they allocate troops and maybe who they go to war with. They'll both pass laws favoring big businesses, just different businesses and different ways to favor said businesses.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 23, '12 at 9:54pm
MageGrayWolf
9,118 posts
|
Honestly, they'll both do the same thing in slightly different ways. They'll both hand out butt loads of money to businesses, the only difference being which businesses. They'll both keep military troops deployed in areas they shouldn't be, the difference being how they allocate troops and maybe who they go to war with. They'll both pass laws favoring big businesses, just different businesses and different ways to favor said businesses.
You're probably right when it comes to money and business. As for troop deployment Obama's proposals would call for fewer troops. As for if that would be held to is another story. i do see other issues that should be looked at.
Which side has advocated separation of church and state and which hasn't?
Which side advocates equal rights fro homosexuals and which does not?
Which would likely give us better foreign standing?
We should also consider the behavior of the parties they are with as a whole.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 23, '12 at 9:55pm
SSTG
6,997 posts
|
Honestly, they'll both do the same thing in slightly different ways. They'll both hand out butt loads of money to businesses, the only difference being which businesses. They'll both keep military troops deployed in areas they shouldn't be, the difference being how they allocate troops and maybe who they go to war with. They'll both pass laws favoring big businesses, just different businesses and different ways to favor said businesses.
That's the way it is, rich people use corruption to get richer and It'll never change until people start voting for the ones who actually do the job instead of the candidates belonging to a party.
|
| |
