It all because of legal guns. No guns, no shooting.
Is this sarcasm? I hope this is sarcasm.
The majority of gun crimes use weapons illegally obtained. Fact.
So what you are saying is that police is useless, and cant catch a few uneducated lawbreakers?
What does that have to do with anything? Let's back up to a very base point: Police do NOT protect individuals, but society as a whole. They cannot stop you from being murdered, they will just catch your killer. They are a deterrent, not a protective force. Police are there for after a crime has been committed, not before. Trust me, you do not want to live in a society where they can stop every crime (unless you like a totalitarian police state, then by all means, love it).
My Question is are you americans losing it or what?
No more than anybody else. You take a few people, three or four, and say Americans as a whole are losing it? Do you see what's wrong with this picture?
and no, its not normal that you have enough fire power to rebel.
Who cares if it's normal? It keeps the power hungry pigs at the top in check.
aotumatic guns that can resist arrest,
Considering how on a year to year basis, there are typically only enough murders involving automatic weapons that I can count on one hand, none of which are legally obtained, I think you need to worry about absolute numbers and not potential for damage. In three days, with just the materials at my house, I can create a bomb powerful enough to kill dozens. Will I? No. It's not potential for damage that's important, or intent of manufacture, but absolute statistical value that gun laws need to be created, and adjusted, on.