The Venus Project is a form of anarcho-communism. Stephan Molyneux is an anarcho-capitalist who debated the Venus Project on a radio show (I don't know if it was his show or someone else's show).

Stephan Molyneux discusses the Venus Project

If communism worked, you can achieve it through the free market.

If sharing everything you own and granting joint ownership to everyone who joins a company truly is more productive and desirable than the capitalist system, then it will naturally work in a free market. However, when you want and another person wants, ownership IS necessary.

Everyone is literally different from one another, which means there will be conflicts. There will be two people who won't want to share, and they won't come up with compromises. This happens enough as it is, but property rights allows us to get past these issues.

Murray Rothbard the man who invented the idea of Anarcho-capitalism said himself that they are not anarchists, saying "we are not anarchists, and those who call us anarchists are not firm etymological ground, and are being completely unhistorical" Because, all anarchists had socialistic elements in their doctrines and possessed socialistic economic doctrines in common" This is from his article called "Are Libertarians 'Anarchists'?"

Murray Rothbard is WRONG. Not all anarchists hold socialistic economic doctrines. That's like saying all communists are Russian.

In conclusion, it is not anarchism, you are just a capitalist. And what you will have on your hands is what we have today. Corruption and tons of power to the rich.

Do not use the word "power" if you do not understand what power is. The rich are "powerful" because they are able to bribe the government. THIS is why we have anarcho-capitalists. The rich have very little power when there isn't government to bribe.

That is anarcho-capitalism. Anarchism is a stateless society, and anarcho-capitalism is a stateless society that operates off a free market. That is literally a form of anarchy.

If you support a free-market that exists without government, you're an anarchist, and anyone who says otherwise is misconstruing the definition of anarchism.

Capitalism, socialism, and communism all have to do with economics. They can all theoretically be anarchist, or totalitarian. They can all be a democracy, or an autocracy.

"Anarcho capitalism is sort of like state socialism: nice in theory; individuals who own buisness and buy labor, others who sell labor and all that, in a world where there's no large, centralized power base but it has tons or real-world inapplicability. Invidiual and olipolic tyrannies being little substitute for state tyranny is one of them."

It's impossible to discuss capitalism to someone who doesn't believe in competition.

What's even more scary is how you blatantly ignore all the problems associated with communism. You even suggested we go without currency. You have no idea how trade works at all, except for the basic "I give you A and you give me B." You fail to understand that trade must be consensual and if two people don't have what the other person wants, trade doesn't take place. In a society without currency, you WILL have this problem.

Currency exists as a medium so that two people who don't have objects the other desires can still trade.

Money is not the root of greed, desire for objects is the root of greed. You use money to buy said objects. Getting rid of money will not get rid of the desire for objects. That is a FACT.