I'm sorry, but is this a test? Because there is no need to have a hyphen in between the words 'super' and 'intellegent' (which, I must point out, is spelt incorrectly). Furthermore, your definition of intelligence must be established, as well as what would define being 'super' intelligent. Would this test define the standard? But there can't be an infallible method for finding a good basis of intelligence without first defining it thoroughly and efficiently. This also brings up another problem; what if somebody less intelligent correctly played this game while somebody of more intelligence did not do as well or has failed?
