ForumsSupport ForumA soltuion to get in the record books ALOT faster.

6 1874
jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,353 posts
Farmer

There has already benn a thread about trying to get as many thread replys as possible, but it looks like it will take longer then expected = ).
(heres the thread : http://armorgames.com/community/thread/2539134/lets-break-guiness-records-in-the-most-thread-replies)

I have a solution to get to our goel faster.
1.Make one new whole section for this one thread.
2.Posts will not = armor pionts.
3.You can only post ounce per page ( as mentioned in the first thread).

The thing is if we could be aloud to say like:
'Hi'
or
'I like redsox!'
We could reach this goel 100 x faster!
(and you can only spam in this thread)

What you think?

  • 6 Replies
jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,353 posts
Farmer

O yes and I forgot to mention:
Copy all the replys to the new topic page.

firetail_madness
offline
firetail_madness
20,591 posts
Blacksmith

I don't think getting the most thread replies is that important. This would cause Shpigdford to work a whole lot harder to create a new section, and I think the "No Spam" rule applies to all parts of the forums.

jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,353 posts
Farmer

No Spam" rule applies to all parts of the forums.

Yes that very true , but I meant JUST for this thread.
And you could only post ounce,plus you do not earn any armor pionts.
flappybob999
offline
flappybob999
797 posts
Peasant

Quick reply:
'Ounce' measures weight. So why are you applying it?
I also think that getting in the Guinness world records is definitely not one of our priorities. Also, I think that thread died out or is dying.

jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,353 posts
Farmer

Its not dead I just saw people posting there.

'Ounce' measures weight. So why are you applying it?

What????Lol I dont understand.

Guinness world records is definitely not one of our priorities

I never said it was , but as people pass by they post , then the next day they do again.
And sooner then you know it weve got the record.
NoNameC68
offline
NoNameC68
5,043 posts
Shepherd

We have no intention of making it into the record books that way. In fact we could care less as a website.

Showing 1-6 of 6