I have come to see a link between the rise of women, their increasing rights, involvement in politics, and the feminist movement and the increasing stupidity, perversion of culture, and all around degeneracy in the west. These irrational, pseudo-sentient life forms have done naught but sap the life out of intellectual and powerful men over the last hundred years or so, and we men have made the mistake of brainwashing ourselves to believe that these succubi are actual people. Their whole kind are nothing more than tools for procreation, unfit to live without a patron's approval. Allow me to make my case. Women are naturally cowards. I myself have met women who have admitted to me that they and their whole kind are born cowards. They are timid creatures whose emotions overpower their logic and rationality, and they are therefore unfit to lead. Their extreme emotions are triggered by slight and unimportant things, and with these worries they hinder the progress of man. Remember the last time your girlfriend got angry at you for that thing that to this day you have no idea what she was talking about? Imagine that ruling a society or a country. Imagine that fight being with another world leader. Imagine an irrational war because of the errancy of women. I'm glad Hillary lost so that America may live a few years longer. Mankind used to be male dominated, and with good reason. Women knew their place, and men kept them there. Now, let's look at the achievements in this long period of history. We have such political achievements as the republic and the democracy. We then have technological advancements such as irrigation, the hanging gardens, the printing press, electricity, factories, cars, computers, and now even the internet. We also have such historical achievements like the Neolithic Revolution, the American and French revolutions. We have the great thinkers of history, like Socrates, Aristotle, Boethius, Bacon, Marx, Nietzsche, Borh, and, of course, Einstein. Who do you think was the most intelligent person in history, who could change the way you think, whose infinite wisdom puts this person on level with the gods? He was a man, wasn't he? Back when we were a male dominated society, men did not even love women. Most of the great men of history were gay, only having wives for children. Shakespeare was gay, Da Vinci was gay , to name a few. Men can survive without women (for lack of children, granted). Take modern gay people for example. Why do you think they are so happy? With gene science as it is now, we can make humans effectively enough without women soon enough. Jesus Christ. Now, let's look at more modern times, shall we? In 1920, women gained the right to vote. Coincidentally, we have not had a good president since the nineteenth century. In 1966, we had a cultural revolution. Great and all, but that's when police and the government became the bad guys. Degeneracy ran wild and became commonly accepted as culture. Then, come 1977, the Feminist movement. That was the death knell of the west as it was formerly known. Since these cum dumpsters decided they were people too, the west has become one grand showing of Dumb and Dumber. We now have what has to be the stupidest couple of generations since the Salem witch trials. We no longer have great philosophers; we no longer have great authors. We have become a nation glued to MTV and teenNICK. Remember G4TV? That's pretty much all of America at this point. And for God's sake, just look at our teenagers. What have we done to let our youth become so terribly corrupted and utterly stupid? To quote Chuck Palahniuk, "We are a generation of men raised by women". We have indeed let ourselves be led astray by the foolish little minds of women. The fact that what I say, by modern standards, is sexist and therefore bad is further proof that we have been brainwashed. Women have convinced us that they have sufficient mental capacity to feel real emotion and can therefore be "hurt" and that we need to protect them. This is a lie. We have today naught but broken shards of society, the ghost of the greatness that humankind once was.
... You thought this over didn't you... Are you maybe a 9 year old who is afraid of girls? Er.. My dad heard that most males born recently in all species are being slightly less male and more female, to bring up a point... How can you say that women cannot "feel"? I know several women/girls that have very strong feelings about the same things as me. I'm not gonna try and argue with you though, because you are just gonna flame on and on. Oh well, I just stated my opinion.
Um, I actually read all of that, and you couldn't be more wrong.
You say that women "get in the way" of great men? Martha Washington is one example that proves you wrong. George Washington would have been nothing if not for the support of his wife. You also forget that DaVinci and Shakespeare were considered maniacs in their day.
I would elaborate, but it isn't worth any more of my time.
Agreed with 86. This is my last post here probably, but.... DaVinci and Shakespeare were homosexual? Or are you just using gay as a general insult-like term? Epic Fail.
My head hurts from reading that, but I will try to make somewhat of a comment. Ok, you think women have destroyed man's society, but if it wasn't for your mother who in fact is a woman (hopefully) you are in fact insulting every woman in a 3 page long summary. Which if it wasn't for women you wouldn't even be on this Earth. Men aren't the only people who have influenced science, mathematics, and medical studies. If there were no women their would be no increase in male populations either. So, your topic is totally biais. Yep, this is pointless. I wonder what Zoph and Carlie will say when they read this if they do.
You also forget that DaVinci and Shakespeare were considered maniacs in their day. By that you mean that they were crazy. Actually they are one of the most fascinating artists of today.
Please.. Separate your text into multiple paragraphs if you're going to type this much...
At any rate, you're not right. Women haven't made many historical achievements yet because they have either been discriminated against or their achievements just weren't documented. Frankly, you sound like Hitler blaming the Jews for all the problems. Your post contains countless things unexplained and countless fallacies, but I'll only point out a few. I use sarcasm.
Women are naturally cowards. I myself have met women who have admitted to me that they and their whole kind are born cowards.
Well, if one woman said it, then it must be true! You're confusing cowardice with pacifism, anyways.
Remember the last time your girlfriend got angry at you for that thing that to this day you have no idea what she was talking about?
You're targeting teenagers here, especially with the "your girlfriend" part. Of course teenagers will be moody and snappish. Teenage guys can be just as bad, just in a different way. Tell me if you need examples here.
Back when we were a male dominated society, men did not even love women. Most of the great men of history were gay, only having wives for children. Shakespeare was gay, Da Vinci was gay , to name a few.
You're using the Appeal to Authority Fallacy (lazy argument in which you just point out the fallacies FTW!). Google it if you need to. Shakespeare and Da Vinchi aren't philosophers, psychologists, or women.
Take modern gay people for example. Why do you think they are so happy?
I don't really know why people think that. The out-of-the-closet gays are the ones that people notice are gays, and they must have self-confidence to be out-of-the-closet, making them happy.
Then the rest of your argument uses a false cause and effect. ()
And let's not forget the damage caused by men. Wars by religion, halocausts, deceiving, and all those inventions destroying the earth and us shrugging every detail. The fact that man's natural instinct to own and become territorial is the reason why wars exist. And the religious ones even more dangerous. Religious wars because of man has caused the invention and ideas streak to be limited and slowed down. Women would have at least given the poor chaps a chance.
With all of our increasing human rights, studies have shown that the rate of technological growth has increased substantially since the age of "Man, and ONLY Man!". If we took all of that, and gave it from the first time of religion conflicting with independent thinking, we would be in the technological age of 3009. This can go even farther than that too, because basically, religion, and all forms of it has dominated and limited the range of independent thinking, and during that time, women were seriously treated as w.h.o.r.e.s. until they finally got the rights they deserved.
Where I'm going with this, if we included all rights, taken out by petty dignity and pride of the selfish man, we would be much better off than we are now. Who knows? If we added the growth back then, we would have probably already figured out how to eliminate all harmful chemicals destroying our atmosphere and eliminating Global Warming.
It's not like women are dumber than us or anything. On the contrary, my dear Xanatu, WOMEN ARE NATURALLY SMARTER THAN US, BECAUSE THEY THINK RATIONALLY! If you really would have thought this through, you could've added in a few paragraphs =)
