This is a rather basic question that I happen to find myself asking sometimes. What is your opinion? State which you think would've come first and give a good reason as to why. I don't know if there has already been a thread on this, but I apologize if there has.
But how could the chicken come without the egg? And how could the egg come without the chicken? And where does the rooster come in? I suppose it came before the chicken, kind of like Adam and Eve.
everytime something is born, it is slightly different
each chicken born is slightly different from previous chickens
so some animal that wasnt a chicken layed an egg, something more like a chicken came out, then that layed an egg, and then something with chicken DNA came out. of course, this took millions of years.
Well where does he come in? I think that the chicken and rooster came first together as micro-bacterial organisms and evolved to the point where they could reproduce and make an eg. What does AG think of my logic?
I think that the chicken and rooster came first together as micro-bacterial organisms and evolved to the point where they could reproduce and make an eg.
A micro-bacteria is not a chicken but an egg is an egg whether it is a chicken egg or a snake egg etc. They reckon birds evolved from dinosaurs. Were dinosaurs chickens? No. Did dinosaurs have eggs? Yes.
