ForumsThe TavernWhat it Takes to Become a Moderator (page 1):

588 187971
cormyn
offline
cormyn
2,908 posts
570

Hey everyone,

In my time at Armor Games, I've seen a few new moderators come on board, and every time we promote a user to Moderator status, there's always a flurry of "why wasn't I picked?" or "I think _____ should be a Moderator" or "why is ________ still a moderator" or lots of other questions about what it really takes to be a Moderator on the site.

As of this writing, I have three comments on my profile asking for 'exact' requirements for becoming a Moderator.

I know we have information scattered around the site, but I wanted to sum up briefly a few of the core things we look for in a user in order to be nominated to become a Moderator. Hopefully this will help clear up some of the confusion.

This topic is meant to be informational in nature. I will delete any message containing text which is negative towards our current team, comments suggesting some other user be nominated, replies of "well, I guess I'll never qualify" or anything else off-topic -- even if your message contains other good ideas. This is not the place for *those* discussions.

Also, it should be obvious that this list is NOT complete, because we don't want to give away EVERY detail about what we look for in a moderator. And this list is also subject to change over time, especially when AG3 launches.

--------------

BACKGROUND

We are obviously much more strict in our criteria than other sites, but that's only because we already have the best users out there and we want to be sure that anyone being a Moderator can follow our rules, guidelines, and get along with others.


THE PROCESS

In a nutshell, candidates are presented to the entire Moderator team, and are reviewed thoroughly by an Admin. The Moderator team decides unanimously (the exception being users who are on hiatus/holidays) on whether to accept the user or not; a negative response could either be "this user should never be a moderator" (and give reasons why) or "let's check back in 3-6 months". If an affirmative decision is made, an Admin user will Email the user asking if they'll accept the role and responsibilities. If the user accepts, the Admin user will promote them to become a probationary Moderator. We guide probationary Moderators for a little while and then release them into the wild.


HOW WE FIND USERS

There are two ways we find potential nominees.

First and foremost is by daily interactions within the forums or user profile comments. That's not to say that ONLY &quotopular" people will get nominated, but we're not likely to nominate someone that nobody really knows. We've recently passed on a half dozen users because none of us really know them as individuals. We'll start paying more attention to them now, of course.

The second method we use is a piece of software I wrote which takes some of the quantifiable criteria mentioned below and scans our database looking for users who qualify. Generally, this software finds HUNDREDS of users, and then starts disqualifying them based on other factors. Once it reports the users to me, I examine the user profiles, and then present a final list of nominees to the Moderator team. Candidates to whom the Moderator team give a definitive 'no way, never', we add to a 'skip' list so the software won't even look at them next time. There's a second "skip list" for users we want to check back on in a few months.

The last scan I did, which resulted in Freakenstein being added to the team, found almost 400 users, filtered them down to less than a dozen, and we were left with one definite 'yes' (Freakenstein), and a handful of "let's check back later" candidates (who we will not name).


SOME OF THE CRITERIA WE LOOK FOR

To be considered as a Moderator nominee, here are SOME of the things we look for. This list is not complete and is subject to change at any time without notice. We may or may not alter this forum posting to describe new or changed criteria. Also, meeting all of this criteria doesn't guarantee anything, because the rest of the Moderator team still has to vote on accepting you into our small team.

- You obviously need to have an excellent understanding of our Terms and Conditions for being on the site, and know the Rules & Guidelines for both the forums and game/user comments. And you follow them yourself.

- You need to stay up to date on things happening at Armor Games, especially with Armor Games v3 coming out later this summer. Users who have been in the beta since late last year will get extra points.

- You need to have an exceptional grasp of the English language (excellent spelling and grammar) but being fluent in one other language for support purposes may help your chances. You don't need to be an English professor, but 1337-speaking / textmsg writing styles, or writing styles which are difficult to read/understand will disqualify you.

- You need to be able to take criticism, from Admins, other Moderators, and especially other users. And you need to humbly accept this criticism when it's "constructive", or learn when it's "destructive" and deal with it accordingly without losing your cool.

- You need to be at LEAST 18 years of age; if you don't share your birth date on your profile (at least the year and month), you'll never even show up on our radar. And we have backups of our user data, so don't go changing your profile birth date trying to cheat the system -- we'll ask for proof.

- You need to have been an active, consistent member of the site for a minimum of 12-18 months. Big gaps in your login/posting history will generally reset this timer.

- You must be a genuinely helpful person within several forums. We watch where you post, how frequently you post, how many times you've posted in each forum, whether you're posting just to jump in on the conversation or genuinely getting involved in the topic, etc.

- We look for well-rounded users who also have good communication via user comments, but not to an excessive (spammy) degree. As such, users who carry on really long conversations back and forth (technically against our rules) will probably get passed on.

- We look for a minimum participation level from forum posts AND user comments. We need to see that you don't just focus on one type of commenting. Obviously we won't quantify these "minimum" values, because we don't want users trying to cheat the system.

- We look for a minimum number of rated games and game comments, and *recent* game ratings and comments, because we need to know you're actually playing the games and having fun too, not just hanging out in the forums 95% of the time. If you never participate in game comments, how will you recognize bad game comments versus merit-worthy comments?

- You must not have excessive quantities of user/game comments removed as spam. "Excessive" is subjective, but we can see how many comments you've had deleted, and we weigh that as a ratio against your remaining active comments.

- Generally, we tell users that even a single temporary ban will disqualify you. A temp-ban for flaming, spamming, harassment, fighting, racial comments, excessive swearing, or blatant rule breaking like hacking will certainly disqualify you. But if the temp-ban happened a long time ago (more than a year and a half), while we never "expunge" them from your history, we may treat them lighter than if your temp-ban was more recent.


WHAT DO WE EXPECT FROM OUR MODERATORS

New Moderators will start out working on cleaning up game comments and forum posts, and looking for merit-worthy game comments. They'll also continue to be helpful in the forums and via user comments to offer help and support, making sure other users are aware of the rules of the web site (and follow them).

We understand that life throws a curve-ball now and then, and while we certainly don't expect Moderators to be on the site every single day, we do expect that you're on the site several times per week. We also expect Moderators to take a break/holiday from time to time. This isn't a paid job, you're doing it for free, so don't feel guilty if you need to step away for a little while. Excessive absences may get you demoted back to regular user status.

And of course, you can always turn us down if you don't want to be on the team, and you can leave the team at any time as well.

----------------

Hopefully that helps clear up some of the confusion about what kind of users we look for as Moderators.

Let the discussion begin.

  • 588 Replies
GhostOfMatrix
offline
GhostOfMatrix
15,535 posts
6,600

So my question is, is there a point in ranking up once you've been promoted to Moderator?

Not really, just have to have an adequate number of things. Such as the things stated in the opening post, you gotta show your active on the site and you participate in the community.
So, would you be able to continue being promoted, or is there no point in doing so once you become a Moderator, or even Admin?

Huh? Are you talking about the ranks? Well, it just comes from what you do in the community, currently. Moderators do still participate in the community, so they will eventually rank up like everyone else here who does stuff in the community. One of the moderators is actually a gold king, and two-three others are of king/queen rank or higher.
cormyn
offline
cormyn
2,908 posts
570

is there a point in ranking up once you've been promoted to Moderator?


We still expect our Moderators to be users of the site, playing the games, leaving comments, posting in the forums. Not just being the 'olice' of the web site.
xDuked
offline
xDuked
29 posts
20

Well, it takes a lot of work for a moderator since I can see... Well, whoever's moderator, good work!

sam12396
offline
sam12396
3 posts
265

What other positions are available on this site other then moderator and admin?

acmed
offline
acmed
3,526 posts
460

What other positions are available on this site other then moderator and admin?


That's it. Mods and admins. There might be some super secret spy jobs AG admins are hiding from us, but there's probably some password to it. I bet they have training centers though. Google it...
cormyn
offline
cormyn
2,908 posts
570

To be an admin, you need to get a full-time job with Armor Games. (we're hiring)

There are no other super secret roles.

Kenshi
offline
Kenshi
2 posts
75

To the host of the post,

I can perfectly understand why the exceptions of moderation are taken into account during the decisions of promotion, (i.e. "Should we make this person a moderator) but why does personal backround and fame apply to the final take in the reccomendation? Sure, it makes sense that you would want someone with a clean record, but the intake of fame in the decision, I think, is a little unneccessary. It's good for the moderator promoted to be well known, but that doesn't mean it should outrank the users personal character. I'm not neccessarily asking for an answer, but I think you should take into consideration that if someone's trustworthy enough, their fame shouldn't outbalance that. Delete this comment if you must, for it is i guess, in some way, negative, but I just want to express what would be more "right" than "easy"

Power to the People

Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,562 posts
4,140

It's not so much fame that we are looking for, but the posting record and the activity that would bring about said fame. It goes without saying that if you post frequently, people will get to recognize you. But that's technically what we're not looking for. We want to see good, solid activity coming from potential users and a strong grasp of core forum areas. It's not just frequent posting alone either. We don't want to see your frequent posts "effortless", or "spammy". That ties in with the "how many posts and comments were deleted in relation to how many were legit".

Fame is an unintended side effect, but it does happen when users post frequently, present good points, and help others. Hope that answers your question

acmed
offline
acmed
3,526 posts
460

And just an add on:

When Freakenstein was announced as new mod, nobody was like "Hey, who's this Freakenstein person?" Everyone actually knew Freakenstein from the forums as a loyal, Mod worthy man. I even see helping posts all over from him when he wasn't even a mod. And yet I heard him say "I'm writing all of this helpful stuff to be mod". He's a helper and is mod worthy.

Cenere
offline
Cenere
13,743 posts
3,230

Even simpler put: If the mods don't know you, you are not going to get picked. The more well known you are, the bigger is the chance that the mods are aware you exist (and like you enough to let you in on the team).

jayjay9
offline
jayjay9
498 posts
1,190

Cenere got a guide to become a Moderator on his Profile.

Monaerch
offline
Monaerch
3 posts
10

Would you select someone who is under 18 if you know that they are mature?

acmed
offline
acmed
3,526 posts
460

Would you select someone who is under 18 if you know that they are mature?


I would doubt it. I think they would want a mod atleast 18 to know for sure they are mature.
Patrick2011
offline
Patrick2011
12,326 posts
8,365

Cenere got a guide to become a Moderator on his Profile.


That guide is wrong. This thread is the correct guide.
Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,562 posts
4,140

Would you select someone who is under 18 if you know that they are mature?


They would have to be quite the exception!
Showing 46-60 of 588