Forums → News and Feedback → What are your thoughts on AG3?
50 | 14232 |
- 50 Replies
50 | 14232 |
I haven't taken a Huge look into it, but from what I've seen I don't like it all that much at all. I'd love to see other peoples opinions on it. I've always liked the classic look of Armor Games that they've been sporting for quite some time. The newer one looks to, well new lol.
i think ag3 is great i was an original beta tester and i love the layout its got cool new features to it
i dont like it as much as other people, it looks like a knock-off, i cant comment, and the only thing i like is less ads next to your game
Currently, yes. It looked much better in closed beta. But if they decide to keep it the way it is then that's business for you. It doesn't matter what a few people think as long as it appeals to the vast majority.
I looked around it and checked out everything I could on the new beta site. I kept running into games that lagged more on the new site that didn't lag on the old site. I kept having alot of trouble with alot of stuff actually. I think the creators of the new site tried to rush into it to much.
Why mess with a good thing?
Myspace lost all their fans by redoing stuff till people just said forget this and they went to either twitter or facebook. I see the same in Armor Games future unless they redo the new site and start over with what's really important.
I'll always be a fan of the old site layout but the new sites home page and slideshow isn't half bad.
I give the old site 10/10
New site 4/10
Currently, yes. It looked much better in closed beta. But if they decide to keep it the way it is then that's business for you. It doesn't matter what a few people think as long as it appeals to the vast majority.
I like AG2 the way it is. I personally don't think such a huge change is necessary.
It seems, however, that the general public disagrees with me, and I have no choice but to accept AG3 as an inevitability.
ugh i knew we should have waited longer for public beta...
You can't comment or rate (yet).
I've seen some arguments on this, but however I have a sort of neutral perspective. I like the design and visuals on AG3 and I think it would be a improvement to AG's already high status, but I believe the new extras are a bit unnecessary because the AG2 site has been showing this crisp, classic look that has been a trademark for AG(In my opinion).
Change however is nature, and I do look forward to the future AG website. All that I am expecting is for the new site to continue with the AG simplicity that is shown in AG2...
This is just my opinion.
That's really cool. People have been requesting backgrounds and different languages for a while now, so it's good that they finally got around to adding them. Only problem I have with the background changes are that when you pick the bottom one (Parchment, currently my favorite aside from Medieval) you can't see the top ones, only two above that one. They should add a little scroll bar to it.
Yep, that's why I couldn't see all of them. Oh well, it's not that big of a deal. I can just click on the medieval one if I want to see them all.
They tried too hard on the new AG3... I like the simple look of AG2... the new theme kinda throws me off, more on the page rather than the actual games.
hmm wierd that that effeted the toolbar! hmm weird... well GoM... AD blocking ugh... go to this link:
don't like ads? click here!
They tried too hard on the new AG3...
They tried too hard on the new AG3... I like the simple look of AG2... the new theme kinda throws me off, more on the page rather than the actual games.
hmm wierd that that effeted the toolbar! hmm weird... well GoM... AD blocking ugh... go to this link:
don't like ads? click here!
You must be logged in to post a reply!