Community
One Dilly of a Pickle, ain't it?
Thread Locked
|
Posted Jun 20, '12 at 9:09pm 2,450 posts |
INTRODUCTION Thread Background Armor Games, I give you The User's View. Armor Games Background Staff Changes Part 1: Cormyn Part 2: Inactivity Migration Generation Transition Part 1: Veterans Part 2: New Users Armor Games v3 Conclusion ~Salvidian Those who contributed to this information in some way, shape, or form |
|
Posted Jun 20, '12 at 9:23pm 2,450 posts |
I was forced to remove some of the information because I had an issue with posting. Upon reading the information, |
|
Posted Jun 20, '12 at 9:51pm 2,516 posts |
One, how did I add anything to this when I did not even know about it? Two, I will post my opinions about all of this tomorrow. |
|
Posted Jun 20, '12 at 10:23pm 10,759 posts |
Forum activity seems like it's at an all time low. Most likely due to how few forumers we have now - ~20 or so. When I created my account in 2010 and even in 2011 I'd see many names and there was a new post every few minutes, while now you're lucky to see a new post every half hour. People are probably done dealing with all the glitches and waiting for the new site. I know some people recommend creating new interesting threads, but if they haven't then why do they think we have any ideas that haven't been posted already? I've tried in the past - spent about half an hour on every new thread but they only reached about five posts before getting lost. There's no player-staff relationship as they don't post frequently. All we see from them is stuff in the S&S subforum and it's usually addressing game issues. I'd like to see admin involvement in the AG3 subforum, as we haven't heard anything since Cormyn left. Most people in the top 100 have probably left, I rarely see any of them participating in the community. A few that come to mind are Cenere, Mage, and Ernie but they usually just stick to one subforum - AMW/S&S, WEPR, and tavern respectively. I check here daily but I've been spending more time on Kongregate because they have most of the things discussed in the AG3 subforum that I want. I don't think I'd ever permanently leave AG, I love using this site, but I feel like it's dying. It's been two years since they mentioned AG3, and I'm seriously starting to doubt if they'll ever come out with it. Last we heard from Cormyn it was going to be in summer or winter 2011. Yes, I was excited when it was fresh, but it doesn't seem like they're developing it anymore. On the beta site there haven't been any changes in months. I'm not looking forward to them deleting the forums, if they do it that is. They've mentioned if it's too much of a hassle they will. But if they do I don't think many people would stick around. Personally I wouldn't want to start anew. It's not because of the post count, rather because of all those threads being deleted. Well I'm done with school and it's usually very nice out so I'd rather be out there than inside on my computer. I'm also considering looking for a part time job just like most teenagers. I assume most forumers are also doing the same. However considering how much free time most people have now you'd expect the forum activity to rise instead of decrease; unfortunately new users don't usually stick around for that long. I see new user threads in the newcomers subforum often but that's the last I ever see of those people.
Probably from reading comments. |
|
Posted Jun 20, '12 at 10:51pm 3,341 posts |
You know, I never was really that enthusiastic about the forums after the main drop of forum activity, but this thread seems to make me genuinely excited, especially after a pleasant conversation I am happy to have had. I hate to be a hypocrite, but we do seem to bring this up a bit but never really do much about it, other than bring it up again. Participation is where AG is at fault in my opinion. Of course, threads are a part of this, but I am thinking of literary, artistic, and gaming participation as well. I don't suppose there is much we can do about it except for actually do it and hope that people will actually participate, since that is actually our stumbling point, right? I mean, AG has been around for a while, and I feel like the more major contributors in the forums are becoming a bit exhausted of talking, since we have seemed to do so much of it over such a wide variety of topics, including the fact that there are not nearly as many people that would contribute as much. That's only discouraging participation, it seems. We should try and at least encourage more participation through events.
What of these forums is there of any worth? I would think that starting with fresh forums would encourage more activity.
Perhaps they are working on the more main features of AG3, or are working on stuff they don't quite would feel is good for beta. I don't imagine that achievements are the easiest things to code, or live chat, or so on and so forth... Like was said by Salvidian, a voice for the staff would probably be a much needed encouragement at this point. I'm not sure if AG has even noticed that the community is kind of falling apart, since there is no one to see it. I don't suppose anyone has sent an email to Justin or some other AG employee regarding this recently? |
|
Posted Jun 20, '12 at 11:11pm 1,811 posts |
Justin isn't the head of AG... Dan and John are the head guys as far as I know. (Just to keep the facts straight.) Salvidian, I agree 100% with all of your statements (credit to those who actually had the ideas, just thanking Salvidian for posting them all at once.)
Agree with Daleks, I have to reorganize my thoughts on this and post tomorrow |
|
Posted Jun 21, '12 at 12:15am 3,563 posts |
A great moment. A truly great moment. I did not like him. At all.
If you're seriously considering someone like cormyn, I will e-kick you in the nuts.
Why? There's so little activity in the community only two or three mods are needed. One could go it alone if necessary. The community is tiny. More mods isn't going to make life better. The community is not better or worse than it ever was. Without purposely falling into a golden age fallacy, would I say it was better in older times? Yeah, it was. For me it was. Maybe for others it wasn't. I've been around for a very long time, and I've seen the community change time and time again. Do you know what happens every time it changes? Somebody starts a thread like this either complaining about how the olden days were better or some kind of useless pep rally that's going to be filled with veterans who cry themselves to sleep every night, reminiscing on old happenings and wondering how to change the present more to the likes of the past. It gets obnoxious. It really does. Would I want AG to be like 2009 again? Sure. Those were the times I was still learning who did what, and the ways of the site. There was plenty of crap, but there was plenty of fun, too. I had my share of high-and-mighty moments and plenty of moments I probably should have reacted differently. And then there was 420. But you know, fun stuff, right? Old days were great, and new days are boring. That's how it works. That's how it always is. |
|
Posted Jun 21, '12 at 12:27am 1,973 posts |
*reads* wh-what? Are you...
Well that explains it. With a thinktank like that, of course you're going to come up with some insane, wacked-out pro-Cormyn statements. Of that list, Cenere's is the only opinion I'd suggest anyone even come remotely close to valuing in this matter. Cormyn was one of the worst things that ever happened to AG. His primary outlook on AG was that being an admin automatically meant that he knew what was good for the forum. He put him self up as some sort of beleaguered person doing the work that was required. But the work he was doing wasn't required. It was bull****. Cormyn spent his days making life on the forums worse and then complained about it. He thought he had the ability to lead just because he had the power to lead. But that's all he had. Power. Power granted because he was a programmer. I'm a programmer. Cormyn's role as "community organizer" had no more legitimacy than any other normal user dictating what should be done. The difference was that he had the power to ban anyone who disagreed with him. Disagree? Okay. You can even keep your account. |
|
Posted Jun 21, '12 at 12:32am 8,411 posts |
Cormyn was Alduin and people like the OP are the draugr who still wake up every day to give their life force to the dragon priest leaders |
|
Posted Jun 21, '12 at 12:37am 3,341 posts |
As much as I hate to disagree with you, cormyn may have done some good (if any) in that he gave us infos on AG3. I didn't like him much at all, but I at least have to respect him for doing his job. AG has the opportunity to be a great community, as you may know. Many of you have seen the rise of such a community, or even participated, and that is respectable. However, I feel you are being a mite selfish in terms of the future of AG. Some people may want to see the forums actually put to use, but it doesn't mean you have to moan about it.I hate the repetitiveness of such threads myself, but why do they keep recurring? Because no one is participating, except for these stinkin' threads. But hey, at least they bring you guys back so we can get some negativity, right? |
|
Posted Jun 21, '12 at 12:40am 8,411 posts |
You only think that because you're a draugr and your advanced state of decay prevents you from thinking otherwise |







