It's been about a week and as far as we know, only one person has solved it. The solution is below. If you want to figure this out yourself, then stop reading. You should probably not read any post afterwards either.
SPOILERS
So, the solution to this hare-brained scheme is fairly simple. There are a couple clues to the solution. To be honest, at the start, I don't think any clues were necessary because I didn't think it would've been that difficult. In fact, I worried it might have been too easy and solved within the first few hours because you are a smart bunch. After a day, we were concerned that no one would be able to solve it. As far as I know, only one person has solved it and that was two days in. Maybe others have solved and and didn't care, but I wouldn't know. Since one person solved it, it couldn't have been that difficult. And this was after Strop deliberately posted a hint. It should be clear now that I am deliberately obfuscating the solution in this unnecessarily long paragraph. That itself is a clue, so if you still want to figure it out yourself, then stop reading now. (and no, there's nothing deliberately hidden in this paragraph but wordplay.) What is interesting that is the way we have chosen to hide our messages somewhat highlights our who we are, but that is a different matter entirely. Another interesting thing is that this could have been easily, or not so easily, solved from a logistics point of view. Sure, applying Occam's razor you might come to the conclusion that we aren't saying anything at all, but that doesn't really make sense. Think about it: Why would we create a thread with 'secrets' in the title if we didn't want you to be able to solve it? (aside from messing with you guys, that is.) Back on topic, in a digressive sort of way, you could figure that maybe it wasn't really that hard to cipher and was probably easy to decipher. It couldn't be something like anagrams or allegories. At the start of this, I had suggested several multi-step ciphers, which in hindsight, definitely may have been too difficult, especially with no prize or reward or anything of that sort. I'm sure if it went unsolved for a day more, there might have been some sort of reward just for solving the thing. So what is easy to hide and easy to read? Steganography. It wasn't even complicated steganography either like hiding the message in the third letter before punctuation where you wouldn't even realize there was a hidden message because the apparent message actually made sense. The method we used simple enough for us that we didn't have to hunt for letters or do any difficult time-consuming decoding, but words may have been hard to come by, especially for certain letters. (There's a simple solution to that problem, but it might have made it even harder to solve.) The first sign that should've tipped anyone off was that the words were, well, weird! And the messages didn't really make sense. It was obvious we were hiding something in the words! The cryptic weird "absolutely screwy assemblages" were part of the fun (for us at least), but I think too many users got caught up in how weird they were and tried to extract meaning from those words when they didn't mean anything at all. (Well, except for some of my posts where I hid the message and used the body of the post to communicate. That might have thrown more people off.) I enjoyed the watching the process of solving what was written but a bit disappointed that it didn't get very far beyond figurative language. From my own experience trying and horribly failing to solve cryptic messages that were intended to be solved, I've learned that if what you think is the answer doesn't scream, "This is the answer! Right here! This is right! No ifs, ands, or buts!" then it isn't the solution. If you have your doubts, you can be pretty sure you're wrong. Maybe out intention wasn't clear enough, but it was solved sure enough, so if you still want to solve it yourself, stop reading. So how did we do it? We hid the message in the second letter of every word that had more than one letter, except for that one message of mine on the second page, but it uses the same principle. Ignore all of the words and pick out the second letter and you'll figure out that I made a mistake and don't actually know my ABCs. After that long post on page 7, I thought for sure more users would figure it out and start responding with the same method we used to encode. Maybe they did and didn't post, because there's actually absolutely nothing interesting being said in this thread. In fact, the conversation about what was being said was more interesting than what was being said. So there you have, a mystery demystified into what is ultimately unsatisfying like a lot of things in life because we built it up to be more than it is, but that doesn't mean there aren't things that more that what they seem to be. There are lots of interesting things out there, like how the coloring on the coat of a Siamese cat is basically a heat map! It's true. Look it up. Go out, explore, and learn new things, and not just at your computer or in a book. Take a good long look at a tree the next time you pass by one. You might not even notice if it was replaced by a tree of the same species, since it's background stuff, just like how we might not recognize the difference between two dogs or birds or frogs. (We're certainly better equipped at recognizing people.) This last final digression is obviously to throw off anyone who wanted to skip to the bottom and find the solution, but if you really really really wanted to know how to do it, you probably would have found out how by now.
SPOILERS