This thread is just like Battle of the Bands or Battle of the Brands, except with creatures.
Basically all you do is you vote for an animal that would beat the other.
Today we will solve one of movies greatest mysteries:
Lions
I say vampires, mostly based on the first Underworld movie (being the only one I saw), they just seem....Better, they got all of their abilities whilst still in human form where as werewolves have to change to meat their full fighting potential.
Werewolf transformations are as untimely and as frequent as periods. So it's like, if you're a female werewolf, you have TWO things to worry about. And then there's that whole mess with "What if you get both of them on the same day?"
Well then you're more screwed than what's holding down the Seattle Space Needle.
On the other hand, being a vampire means you can't get a tan. At all. I mean, sure, you can apply Bronzor, but what's the point? All of your vampire friends will already know it's Bronzor just from the pure fact that you're a vampire! And it's twice as embarrassing that you have a tan now! You would think that after thousands and thousands of years, these guys would develop some melanin in their skin, but nope. They still live in the shadows.
Well, I'm going to go with Werewolves. Just because being a vampire is boring.
Werewolf mostly dont even know it. Its like, you wake up in the morning, cover in bloo- ****it its sound like 'eriod' again.... They feel hingry suddenly, angry without reason, hostile to human beings, suddenly you are in a fight, and all the trash talks and the confusion and...
Vampires on the other hand know it. They are vampires and they know it. (Song refference). They also get to wear capes and bow ties. And capes and bow ties are cool.
They also get to wear capes and bow ties. And capes and bow ties are cool.
"Capes"...
And tell me how Nosferatu "knows it". He's just as much an uncontrollable, blood-thirsty beast. Btw, here's one more difference. Werewolves are predators; vampires are parasites. They are like ticks, sucking blood and all that.
The problem with this battle is, it relies solely on interpretations of stories. You can basically invent a feature for any side and use it as argument.
Vampires wear cool old style suits. Which are cool. And there is nothing saying sexy more then Nosfreatu (Nosferatu... Nosferretu!) He is sexualy attractive and he is aware to th'y fact.
But looking at the first image again, that coat was so avant-garde. I mean seriously, I see people with that kind of coat everyday now! Definitely not gonna happen with frill and capes.
And tell me how Nosferatu "knows it". He's just as much an uncontrollable, blood-thirsty beast
In his defense, they couldn't exactly make him charismatic in 1921. And he wouldn't be very scary if he wasn't something of a bloodthirsty beast.
But the character is based on Count Dracula, who is charming, charismatic, and well-aware of his bloodthirstiness as a vampire and actually has more sinister intentions than simply sucking blood.
Werewolves are predators; vampires are parasites.
Vampires are both. They aren't predators as much in an animalistic sense, but they prey on others just as vampires do; they just take a different approach.
I vote for vampires, solely on the basis that I believe it would be much more fun to be a vampire than a werewolf. Sure, I wouldn't be able to go outside in the sunlight, but that wouldn't exactly be the most dramatic of lifestyle changes.