The classic argument over which came first.I wanted to bring this up, because I was thinking a little bit and realized something.Why do scientist believe that the egg came first, if it had no mother to lay it, then keep it warm, and also after the eggs hatched they would have no way of surviving on their own without a parent to take care of them.So why do some scientist think this way when it is common sense that the chicken came first.I want to here your opinions on this matter.
It depends what kind of egg you mean if its just eggs in general then dinosaur or fish eggs were around waaay b4 the chicken so there you go but which came first the chicken or the chicken egg is a different question
Everyone go back to page four of this thread... There's an excellent explanation of why the egg came before the chicken. Species who came before the chicken, even before the birds, laid eggs too.
The REAL question should be: What came first? A hen or a chicken egg? I still vote egg, though.
And why do you think so WarTank? I don't see any proof at all! To be honest, this debate hasn't been going anywhere. This is just another evolution vs creationsim thread. Just put into words and cliche. I'm going to lock this.
