The classic argument over which came first.I wanted to bring this up, because I was thinking a little bit and realized something.Why do scientist believe that the egg came first, if it had no mother to lay it, then keep it warm, and also after the eggs hatched they would have no way of surviving on their own without a parent to take care of them.So why do some scientist think this way when it is common sense that the chicken came first.I want to here your opinions on this matter.
From a literal point of view this question is unsolvable as you cannot have a chicken without an egg being hached and you cannot have an egg without a chicken laying it. It is a good conundrum. From a scientific point of view i agree with Estel in that it has creationism vs evoloutionism undertones. To the rest of the people trying to solve it in this thread. I say it is a classic unsolvable conundrum thingy and you shouldnt worry too much about it.
neither, there is the third party, the ARCHYOPTERIX! Did I spell that right? Sides, this just gave me a theory to the basilisk! HUZZAH! I'm hitting two birds alot today.
