the video of the chupacabre if it was that, definitely wasnt a wolf its front paws were shorter and had a long snout longer than a wolfs so I have to go with the chupacabre as being more believable, nessie second, and bigfoot for all we know could have been some sort of ape someone saw out of its natural habitat and jumped to conclusions.
I would say that out of all of them i think that nessie has the most chance of being real. for the simple fact that it lives underwater and so is harder to catch. The other two if they were real would have been caught by now in my opinion with all the hype surrounding them. At least Nessie has a better chance of escaping human contact under the waves.
the thing people should remember is that, in this day and age, with the advance of photoshop and other computer digital devices, it is very easy to create a "monster" out of a normal animal and make it look very real. IT is because of the ease of transformation that I suggest a good amount of skepticism before believing anything you read/hear/see.
You know, you should have put aliens into the mix too. And there was this guy who admitted to dressing up in a gorilla suit and walking around in the wilderness while this other guy took pictures of him.
There are so many creatures I could describe to you...
There's the lizardmen in the Florida Swamps, the yeti, the Chupacabra, bigfoot, giant squid, the Loch Ness monster, and many more.(I just listed what came off the top of my head)
They are all possible, but I doubt any of them exist. People Like to make stuff up when they see something that doesn't look familiar from far away. Recently I keep thinking I am seeing things out of the corner of my eyes and then I look and focus on the place I was looking and there is nothing or no one there. I think I might be seeing ghosts, but I refuse to believe that because I have not seen something with my eyes directly.