ForumsWEPRbigfoot vs. lochness vs. chupacabra : which is more believable?

81 24915
infernacron
offline
infernacron
1,379 posts
Nomad

I find the existence of all of them highly unlikely but say there were real which would you believe in?

Bigfoot: a hybrid between man and ape
http://nicedeb.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/patterson_bigfoot.jpg

loch ness: a scotch-Irish myth creature.
http://jimbocyberdoc.files.wordpress.com/2007/11<br>/nessie.jpg

chupacabra:a Mexican myth
http://www.mysticcreatures.info/chupacabra2.jpg

  • 81 Replies
Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

Lochness monsta can take both Bigfoot and Chupacabra!

Snizz19
offline
Snizz19
377 posts
Nomad

Didn't they find the body of big foot wasn't it on national television

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

No what they found was a body of some fake thingy that LOOKEd like a big boot.

Raistlin847
offline
Raistlin847
270 posts
Nomad

the video of the chupacabre if it was that, definitely wasnt a wolf its front paws were shorter and had a long snout longer than a wolfs so I have to go with the chupacabre as being more believable, nessie second, and bigfoot for all we know could have been some sort of ape someone saw out of its natural habitat and jumped to conclusions.

kevin44
offline
kevin44
1,777 posts
Jester

bahh thats not real bigfoot thats a guy in a gorrila suit or a gorrila

Probably, but it still has the tiniest chance of being real, so that's why I choose bigfoot.
thoadthetoad
offline
thoadthetoad
5,633 posts
Peasant

Ever heard of Hogzilla? It is real, and possibly a relative of our chupacabra freind/fiend.

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

Ehh the DNA test failed

Guys, in movies they are able to edit anything! Don't you think they can make a stupid chupacabre on video?

woody_7007
offline
woody_7007
2,662 posts
Peasant

I would say that out of all of them i think that nessie has the most chance of being real. for the simple fact that it lives underwater and so is harder to catch. The other two if they were real would have been caught by now in my opinion with all the hype surrounding them. At least Nessie has a better chance of escaping human contact under the waves.

kevin44
offline
kevin44
1,777 posts
Jester

Good point Woody. Think of all the ocean we have yet to explore.

dizzyk
offline
dizzyk
423 posts
Nomad

the thing people should remember is that, in this day and age, with the advance of photoshop and other computer digital devices, it is very easy to create a "monster" out of a normal animal and make it look very real. IT is because of the ease of transformation that I suggest a good amount of skepticism before believing anything you read/hear/see.

Lilboi3000
offline
Lilboi3000
230 posts
Nomad

You know, you should have put aliens into the mix too. And there was this guy who admitted to dressing up in a gorilla suit and walking around in the wilderness while this other guy took pictures of him.

Cholo_Carlos
online
Cholo_Carlos
120 posts
Nomad

There all fake.
No questions asked.

Agent_86
offline
Agent_86
2,127 posts
Nomad

There are so many creatures I could describe to you...

There's the lizardmen in the Florida Swamps, the yeti, the Chupacabra, bigfoot, giant squid, the Loch Ness monster, and many more.(I just listed what came off the top of my head)

Flipski
offline
Flipski
623 posts
Nomad

They are all possible, but I doubt any of them exist. People Like to make stuff up when they see something that doesn't look familiar from far away. Recently I keep thinking I am seeing things out of the corner of my eyes and then I look and focus on the place I was looking and there is nothing or no one there. I think I might be seeing ghosts, but I refuse to believe that because I have not seen something with my eyes directly.

Agent_86
offline
Agent_86
2,127 posts
Nomad

Well, it has been sait that about 90% of &quotaranormal sightings" are staged or just a misunderstanding. But that still leaves the other 10%...

Showing 16-30 of 81