ForumsWEPRbigfoot vs. lochness vs. chupacabra : which is more believable?

81 24916
infernacron
offline
infernacron
1,379 posts
Nomad

I find the existence of all of them highly unlikely but say there were real which would you believe in?

Bigfoot: a hybrid between man and ape
http://nicedeb.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/patterson_bigfoot.jpg

loch ness: a scotch-Irish myth creature.
http://jimbocyberdoc.files.wordpress.com/2007/11<br>/nessie.jpg

chupacabra:a Mexican myth
http://www.mysticcreatures.info/chupacabra2.jpg

  • 81 Replies
Demonarian23
offline
Demonarian23
414 posts
Nomad

Bigfoot: If it would exist, there would be like a million specimens, we would surely find him in notime=>nu bigfoot

Nessie:Byologists searched everywhere and never foud her. This is really BS.

Chupacabra:It is evidence that those where bodies attacked by a kind of moths that put eggs on corpses. The larvae drank all blood.

CommanderC
offline
CommanderC
120 posts
Nomad

chupacabra. bigfoot was a guy in a suit, and nessie is just a fuzzy old picture that could be anything.

CommanderC
offline
CommanderC
120 posts
Nomad

Ammending my previous statemet: chupacabra is the most believable, but I do not believe in any of them.

Demonarian23
offline
Demonarian23
414 posts
Nomad

havent you read wat i said?
this should be locked

Generalhero
offline
Generalhero
396 posts
Farmer

all 3 of them are commercial things invented to make money
it is not a good thing

Showing 76-80 of 81