AGS Steam Games

Forums → Support Forum → [old] Games rated 9 or above deserve merits?

36 5719
juan999999
offline
juan999999
3,012 posts
Jester

I think they should becuase the creators make such good games they deserve merits.That can motivate them to keep making games.

Tell me what you think? =)

Juan Angel Amaro J.R

  • 36 Replies
juan999999
offline
juan999999
3,012 posts
Jester

i agree with fst, 500 votes is a good amount, but what about all of the voters that just vote "10/10" quickly for AP?


Yeah!I once rated a awful game a 10/10!A big mistake.
MagiX
offline
MagiX
1,015 posts
Nomad

Yeah!I once rated a awful game a 10/10!A big mistake.
Exactly. Maybe we should just go with the time frame idea.
juan999999
offline
juan999999
3,012 posts
Jester

But any suggestions on how much time it should maintain that average?

Generalhero
offline
Generalhero
396 posts
Farmer

| well I don't know why this would be necessary if they already get 20 AP for submitting the game,and not only that,but they get paid for creating it,and most of them probably don't really care about AP in the first place.I mean sure if the mods want to do this then they can,but I don't see the point truthfully.Also I believe this has been suggested before.I just can't remember exactly whether or not it has,but I am pretty sure it has. |

I agree with crimsonblade's idea

Agent_86
offline
Agent_86
2,132 posts
Nomad

Well, they already do this on Kong...

If a game is successful, the submitter gets points...

I don't see its usefulness...

ValorUnlimited
offline
ValorUnlimited
17 posts
Peasant

In order to make an economy worthwhile, people should be able to rate the developer on a scale that doesn't offer the account any benefit for doing so. Say, when you click the developer's profile, you can offer a monthly rating based on the work they've done that month. Or maybe they should make a separate type of account for developers. I dunno.

Showing 31-36 of 36