ForumsWEPR[necro] are wars good for economy?

53 11082
deth4
offline
deth4
759 posts
Nomad

are they? you decide

  • 53 Replies
rougie
offline
rougie
45 posts
Nomad

Historically, yes they have been. The WWs provoked big jumps in purchasing, plus enabled a societal change for women to gain employment if they chose. Of course, WWI didn't have such a great effect on Germany (I think inflation went way way up... needed a wheelbarrow full of $$$ to buy bread or something), but they started it, so I suppose thats "karma" or what have you.

This new 'war'... I don't know... It's really not a war, it's more of a prolonged international military presence, and I have to tell you, it really hasn't been good for the economy. Or at least the economy hasn't been doing so well since it's started. The last I saw of the US national debt it was something like 10 trillion. TRILLION!! Because it's several million dollars per missile and several billion dollars per jet to shoot them. The jobs created are outweighed by the sheer cost of these items. Additionally, it's an unpopular war, which means people would not be particularly willing to financially support it (buying war bonds, etc.)

So, historically, yes wars have improved economy (post-war boom), but it feels almost as though the current administration relied on that phenomenon to get them through this thing, which it simply hasn't.

static9
offline
static9
1 posts
Nomad

no. speak to rome and greece its not good for the economy. go to germany ask them about what happened after world war I and world war II. Wars are terrible for economy's. Go to japan asked them how it was immediately after wwii.

samy
offline
samy
4,871 posts
Nomad

WW2 pulled us out of the Great Deppresion, so for the winning side yes.

stonester
offline
stonester
120 posts
Nomad

no if we lose yes if we win!

russianfreak
offline
russianfreak
1,843 posts
Farmer

i guess the winning side is a yes but i don't think it is good to kill like millions of ppl just to make some money $$

Shark7996
offline
Shark7996
373 posts
Nomad

War is good for the weapons economy. If we manage to strike a deal selling something to our allies during a war, then that helps, too. However, the focus of war is usually not economy, just plain old "I'm right and you're wrong" issues.

orgy
offline
orgy
55 posts
Nomad

Fashion,Sport Cars,Luxery...
their life styles are similar to Turkish people...
Also delicious food like pizza,spagetti,raviolli...

woody_7007
offline
woody_7007
2,662 posts
Peasant

Fashion,Sport Cars,Luxery...
their life styles are similar to Turkish people...
Also delicious food like pizza,spagetti,raviolli...


What does any of that have to do with wars and economies?
Zootsuit_riot
offline
Zootsuit_riot
1,523 posts
Nomad

WW2 pulled us out of the Great Deppresion, so for the winning side yes.


That's only because we had such a setup with the Lend & Lease Act, and the reparations from Germany. It's not possible for the wars being fought today in Afghanistan and Iraq could not benefit us in such a way.
crazjayz
offline
crazjayz
243 posts
Nomad

It depends on the acquisitions made during war. If this war in Iraq gave way to US oil company presence, which in turn drove oil prices down, then yes, it would be economically good. Notice I said IF.

But aside from this, there are better ways of increase a nation's economy. Pure product production (such as jets and missiles), while it creates a lot of jobs, isn't the most effective way of boost an economy.

Fyrefox
offline
Fyrefox
2,124 posts
Blacksmith

Wars have been going on for many many years. I for one have never seen anything good coming from a war economy wise. If we refer to the War On Terror we fought for few oil reserves over there, but I don't think that is a benificial way to increase economy which in turn didn't really do anything. As craz said wars make more job by manufacturing military weaponry and vehicles, including jets. This does nothing to a nation's economy if they don't have a basic ammount of income to provide for those resources.

Communist
offline
Communist
522 posts
Nomad

Wars are part of the reason why the Soviet economy fell to peices, their system was only good for making tanks, ICBMs, and aircraft. And because of the Afghan war, a lot of their alredy dwindling supply of funds was being dedicated to the war ( which they lost. ). Therefore, they couldn't help improve the every day lives of their people.

slipsoccer
offline
slipsoccer
1,081 posts
Peasant

No, they cost a lot of money. Then the presedent will have to raise the taxes just to get money for that war you think the Economy would be good without any money?

Itachi2641747
offline
Itachi2641747
264 posts
Nomad

If you look in short sight, they are bad. However, do you want to know a secret? They are good. Want to know why the U.S.A is a world power? WW II.

Lord_Mist
offline
Lord_Mist
571 posts
Nomad

no, of course Not..

so much money has spent because of war..

so, the answer is "no"

Showing 31-45 of 53